Joseph L. Casale writes:
> > You are right. I got a response from David Cantrell and he pointed out
> > how I was going about this completely the wrong way. Will hopefully get
> > this working tomorrow.
>
> Please post your procedure, I have been following this thread with interest!
In brief:
> You are right. I got a response from David Cantrell and he pointed out
> how I was going about this completely the wrong way. Will hopefully get
> this working tomorrow.
Please post your procedure, I have been following this thread with interest!
jlc
_
> are you sure its being used ? apart from that, you really are better
> off working with the issue on the bugtracker, the anaconda developers
> would also mostly like to get feedback if the patch isnt working.
You are right. I got a response from David Cantrell and he pointed out
how I was
On 08/24/2009 06:16 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I've done that - dropped in the updates.img with anaconda+runtime on ext2.
> But I'm still getting the same installer error that the patch is supposed
> to fix.
are you sure its being used ? apart from that, you really are bett
Karanbir Singh writes:
> On 08/23/2009 01:36 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2975
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448006
> > What I'm really trying to do is build a new stage2.img :)
>
> afaict, that should be usable with just
Karanbir Singh writes:
> On 08/23/2009 01:36 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2975
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448006
> > What I'm really trying to do is build a new stage2.img :)
>
> afaict, that should be usable with just
On 08/23/2009 01:36 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2975
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448006
> What I'm really trying to do is build a new stage2.img :)
afaict, that should be usable with just an updates.img - you dont need
to
Karanbir Singh writes:
> On 08/21/2009 05:57 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > I'm trying to build a bugfixed anaconda package for 5.3 x84_64,
>
> What bugs are you trying to fix here ?
Borked kickstart build in 5.2/5.3. I didn't follow the issue closely, but
a patch for it was fi
On 08/21/2009 05:57 PM, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> I'm trying to build a bugfixed anaconda package for 5.3 x84_64,
What bugs are you trying to fix here ?
--
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : 2522...@icq
___
CentOS mailing list
C
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net writes:
>
> I'm trying to build a bugfixed anaconda package for 5.3 x84_64, but there
> are some fairly basic failures, like pkg-config .pc files not being found.
> When I modify the spec file accordingly, linking fails because installed
> libraries are not found
I'm trying to build a bugfixed anaconda package for 5.3 x84_64, but there
are some fairly basic failures, like pkg-config .pc files not being found.
When I modify the spec file accordingly, linking fails because installed
libraries are not found.
$ rpmbuild -ba anaconda.spec
Executing(%prep):
11 matches
Mail list logo
