Re: [CentOS] Apache mpm itk

Il 2023-05-17 01:12 Chris Adams ha scritto: The package was orphaned in Fedora, so there's no maintainer to create and manage builds. Hi, I did not know that. Thanks for sharing. -- Danti Gionatan Supporto Tecnico Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it GPG

Re: [CentOS] Apache mpm itk

Once upon a time, Gionatan Danti said: > Il 2022-09-23 19:06 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: > >Hi all, > >the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module > >for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID. > > > >For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I

Re: [CentOS] Apache mpm itk

Il 2022-09-23 19:06 Gionatan Danti ha scritto: Hi all, the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID. For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it entirely for RHEL9. Is the module

[CentOS] Apache mpm itk

Hi all, the EPEL repository for CentOS7 contains httpd-itk, an apache module for running different vhosts under specific user/group ID. For RHEL8 I can find it only in 3rd party repos, while I misses it entirely for RHEL9. Is the module deprecated? Can it be re-included into EPEL? Regards.

Re: [CentOS] Apache APISIX on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)

On 14/04/2022 20:03, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Kaushal, [root@]#journalctl -u apisix.service Apr 14 23:29:42 apacheapisixapigateway apisix[1798]: /usr/local/openresty/luajit/bin/luajit ./apisix/cli/apisix.lua start Apr 14 23:29:42 apacheapisixapigateway apisix[1798]: etcd cluster version 3.3.0 is

[CentOS] Apache APISIX on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core)

Hi, I installing Apache APISIX https://apisix.apache.org/ on CentOS Linux release 7.9.2009 (Core) by referring to https://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/how-to-build [root@]#systemctl cat apisix.service # /usr/lib/systemd/system/apisix.service # apisix systemd service #

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 11:49 PM Alexander Dalloz wrote: > Am 06.01.2021 um 19:10 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:48 PM Christopher Wensink < > > cwens...@five-star-plastics.com> wrote: > > > >> Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions > >> and

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Am 06.01.2021 um 19:10 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:48 PM Christopher Wensink < cwens...@five-star-plastics.com> wrote: Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions and is it owned by the user running apache? Chris Hi Chris, I have added the

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

On Wed, Jan 6, 2021 at 9:48 PM Christopher Wensink < cwens...@five-star-plastics.com> wrote: > Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions > and is it owned by the user running apache? > > Chris > Hi Chris, I have added the below in /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf. The

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Does the file have execute permissions, what is the file's permissions and is it owned by the user running apache? Chris On 1/6/2021 10:13 AM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: Hi, I am running the below php, httpd and CentOS Linux version. # rpm -qa | grep php php73-mbstring-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Am 06.01.21 um 17:13 schrieb Kaushal Shriyan: Hi, I am running the below php, httpd and CentOS Linux version. # rpm -qa | grep php php73-mbstring-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-json-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-fpm-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-pdo-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64

[CentOS] Apache shows PHP code instead of executing it

Hi, I am running the below php, httpd and CentOS Linux version. # rpm -qa | grep php php73-mbstring-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-json-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-fpm-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-pdo-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64 php73-gd-7.3.25-1.el7.ius.x86_64

Re: [CentOS] Apache HTTPD not picking up environment variables.

Thank you very much. That did it! Hal -Original Message- From: CentOS On Behalf Of Jonathan Billings Sent: Friday, October 23, 2020 1:06 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] Apache HTTPD not picking up environment variables. [EXTERNAL SENDER - PROCEED CAUTIOUSLY

Re: [CentOS] Apache HTTPD not picking up environment variables.

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 04:27:34PM +, Harold Pritchett wrote: > I'm trying to install DB2 on a CentOS 7 server. The problem I'm > seeing is that the Apache httpd server fails to pick up the db2 > environment variables. On an older version running under CentOS 5 > this was done by inserting

[CentOS] Apache HTTPD not picking up environment variables.

I'm trying to install DB2 on a CentOS 7 server. The problem I'm seeing is that the Apache httpd server fails to pick up the db2 environment variables. On an older version running under CentOS 5 this was done by inserting the following lines into the httpd start script in /etc/sysconfig/httpd:

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/21/20 12:22 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote: On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: I need to set the umask for apache to 002.  I've tried every idea I've found on the internet,

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/21/20 9:59 AM, Simon Matter wrote: On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: I need to set the umask for apache to 002.  I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.  Most suggest that I put

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

> On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: >>> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: I need to set the umask for apache to 002.  I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.  Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/19/20 10:41 PM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: I need to set the umask for apache to 002.  I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.  Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

> On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: >> I need to set the umask for apache to 002.  I've tried every idea I've >> found on the internet, but nothing make a difference.  Most suggest that >> I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make >> a difference. 

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/13/20 6:40 PM, Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > I need to set the umask for apache to 002.  I've tried every idea I've found > on the internet, but nothing make a difference.  Most suggest that I put > "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a > difference. 

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/15/20 12:21 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS: On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:     Thanks for the info.  I hadn't seen that before

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

Am 15.07.20 um 20:02 schrieb Emmett Culley via CentOS: On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:     Thanks for the info.  I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.  I had seen the suggested

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/15/20 2:39 AM, Gianluca Cecchi wrote: On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote: Thanks for the info.  I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links.  I had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to work.

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 2:39 AM Emmett Culley via CentOS wrote: > > Thanks for the info. I hadn't seen that before nor many of the links. I > had seen the suggested systemd fix, but have never been able got them to > work. And I've tried many combinations. Still no luck. > > There has to be a

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

On 7/13/20 4:21 PM, Phoenix, Merka wrote: I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference.>> Other's suggest

Re: [CentOS] Apache umask

>> I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found >> on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put >> "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a >> difference.>> >> Other's suggest adding something to the

[CentOS] Apache umask

I need to set the umask for apache to 002. I've tried every idea I've found on the internet, but nothing make a difference. Most suggest that I put "umask 002" in /etc/sysconfig/httpd, but that doesn't seem to make a difference. Other's suggest adding something to the httpd.service script

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

On 16/6/20 5:34 pm, Anthony K wrote: The new way to do this is exactly what Gordon suggested - using `systemctl edit ` creates an override in `/etc/systemd/system/httpd.service.d/override.conf`. The only issue is that there is no `systemctl` related command to remove this override - you will

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

Thank you Gordon. That works for me. 8.2 needs the same fix. Alan On 16/06/2020 16:21, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote: If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up.  But during boot, it doesn't and I get the resulting errors below. Jun 15 21:17:28

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

Thanks to all that responded. Gordon's suggestion worked brilliantly. I ran the suggested command, saved the file, rebooted, apache came right up. Can't thank you guys enough. Now, lets try to solve my intermittent connectivity issue, more on that later... Jay > On 16/6/20 4:15 pm,

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

On 16/6/20 4:15 pm, Alessandro Baggi wrote: Note: when you will get update for httpd package all could be reverted to the original status, so to avoid that your modified httpd.service will get an overwrite, create an alternative httpd.service in /etc/systemd/system (if I'm not wrong).

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

Just a wild guess, but it sounds like Apache is being started before the network is online.Is this host simple static Ethernet or DHCP, or is it something more complicated like WiFi? I believe you can set service dependencies with systemd, ideally your apache service isn't started before the

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

> > > Il 16/06/20 08:11, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto: >> >> >> Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto: >>> On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote: If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up.  But during boot, it doesn't and I get the resulting errors below.

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

Il 16/06/20 08:11, Alessandro Baggi ha scritto: Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto: On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote: If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up.  But during boot, it doesn't and I get the resulting errors below. Jun 15 21:17:28 dream

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

Il 16/06/20 06:21, Gordon Messmer ha scritto: On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote: If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up.  But during boot, it doesn't and I get the resulting errors below. Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address:

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

On 6/15/20 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote: If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But during boot, it doesn't and I get the resulting errors below. Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

On 6/15/2020 7:06 PM, Jay Hart wrote: Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address 10.20.30.11:80 Could some transient service be holding port 80 at that time? You could probably arrange to run a script that runs "lsof

Re: [CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

I have always had exactly the same problem. I had to write a script and run it at boot time: sleep 10 /usr/bin/systemctl start httpd Must be some timing problem with the interface addresses not being set up in time. Alan On 16/06/2020 14:06, Jay Hart wrote: If I do 'systemctl start

[CentOS] Apache (httpd) fails to start at boot - Centos 8.1

If I do 'systemctl start httpd', apache will start right up. But during boot, it doesn't and I get the resulting errors below. Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]: (99)Cannot assign requested address: AH00072: make_sock: could not bind to address 10.20.30.11:80 Jun 15 21:17:28 dream httpd[1534]:

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 02/12/2017 à 16:25, Brian Mathis a écrit : > You could write a script to open the permissions, apply updates using > something like http://wp-cli.org/, then close the permissions again. Run > it through cron so you get updates in a timely manner. I just published a detailed blog post about

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 04/12/2017 à 13:58, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : > find $WPDIR -type f -exec chmod 0664 {} \; Oops. 644, not 664. :o) -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail :

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 02/12/2017 à 16:25, Brian Mathis a écrit : > You could write a script to open the permissions, apply updates using > something like http://wp-cli.org/, then close the permissions again. Run > it through cron so you get updates in a timely manner. Here's a little script I wrote to

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 03/12/2017 à 23:59, Pete Travis a écrit : > TL;DR my process is: > - Make a list of real humans that need to work on the site > - Assume the web server user should have at least read access on all > files in the site documentroot, or we'd put them somewhere else. > - Make a list of directories

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Hi Niki, The principle to work by here is 'least required access'. There's two functional types of users we care about, the one executing the PHP code (probably apache or php-fpm) and admins like yourself with FTP/shell access. Upstream wordpress documents application write requirements at

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 02/12/2017 à 16:25, Brian Mathis a écrit : > You could write a script to open the permissions, apply updates using > something like http://wp-cli.org/, then close the permissions again. Run > it through cron so you get updates in a timely manner. This is EXACTLY what I've been looking for.

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

> Am 02.12.2017 um 22:14 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : > > Le 02/12/2017 à 10:30, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : > > ==> Reminder: this is actually the question I'm asking in my post. Oh, we all read (only) what we want :-) > So I'm finally coming to my question. How problematic is

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

> Date: Saturday, December 02, 2017 22:14:19 +0100 > From: Nicolas Kovacs > > Le 02/12/2017 à 10:30, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : > > ==> Reminder: this is actually the question I'm asking in my post. > >> So I'm finally coming to my question. How problematic is it really >>

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 02/12/2017 à 10:30, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : ==> Reminder: this is actually the question I'm asking in my post. > So I'm finally coming to my question. How problematic is it really to > have the apache user and group owning the stuff under /var/www? :o) -- Microlinux - Solutions

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Am 02.12.2017 um 14:27 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : > > Le 02/12/2017 à 14:19, Leon Fauster a écrit : >> I would build a rpm package of wordpress (everything can be defined >> there like permissions etc) > > The initial question was: WHAT permissions? The application design

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

You could write a script to open the permissions, apply updates using something like http://wp-cli.org/, then close the permissions again. Run it through cron so you get updates in a timely manner. ~ Brian Mathis @orev On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 8:27 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Le 02/12/2017 à 14:19, Leon Fauster a écrit : > I would build a rpm package of wordpress (everything can be defined > there like permissions etc) The initial question was: WHAT permissions? > and disabling the automatic update > function in wordpress. Build once it can be installed on all (two

Re: [CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

> Am 02.12.2017 um 10:30 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs : > > Hi, > > Until a few months ago, when I had to setup a web server under CentOS, I > assigned (I'm not sure about the correct english verb for "chown"ing) > all the web pages to the apache user and group. To give you an

[CentOS] Apache and web content permissions

Hi, Until a few months ago, when I had to setup a web server under CentOS, I assigned (I'm not sure about the correct english verb for "chown"ing) all the web pages to the apache user and group. To give you an example, let's say I have a static website under /var/www/myserver on a CentOS server

Re: [CentOS] Apache Compression

On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 16:41:51 -0500 Matt wrote: > I have a centos 7 install with apache running. How do I get apache to > use gzip compression on html and text based content? I don't know how definitive it is, but this is what I use here: AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/text

[CentOS] Apache Compression

I have a centos 7 install with apache running. How do I get apache to use gzip compression on html and text based content? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

On 09/13/2017 08:10 AM, Alan McKay wrote: >> I don't have any official knowledge, but I would suspect that they will >> maintain httpd-2.2 throughout the lifetime of RHEL6. Security issues >> would be backported. (If older versions of RHEL are any indication) > > The basic problem is though

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

So looks like the definitive answer is here for those who have access https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2595461 What I don't understand is in the top left it says "solution unverified" and I"m not sure what that means. Basic summary is that RH will continue to support apache 2.2 to the end of

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

On 13 September 2017 at 14:10, Alan McKay wrote: > > I don't have any official knowledge, but I would suspect that they will > > maintain httpd-2.2 throughout the lifetime of RHEL6. Security issues > > would be backported. (If older versions of RHEL are any indication) >

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

> I don't have any official knowledge, but I would suspect that they will > maintain httpd-2.2 throughout the lifetime of RHEL6. Security issues > would be backported. (If older versions of RHEL are any indication) The basic problem is though that there won't be any security fixes for 2.2 How

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

> Am 13.09.2017 um 01:04 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > > On 09/12/2017 02:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. >>>

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

On 09/12/2017 02:58 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. >> Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. >> >> Has Red Hat announced a plan yet

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

> Am 12.09.2017 um 21:34 schrieb Warren Young : > > I’d assume they’re just going to make their own fixes, I would be really surprised if they wouldn’t be among the main contributors already (if not the main contributor) - or at least have staff that are very familiar

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

On 12 September 2017 at 15:29, Alan McKay wrote: > Hi folks, > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will

Re: [CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

On Sep 12, 2017, at 1:29 PM, Alan McKay wrote: > > I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. > Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. > > Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? > > I am assuming they will up-version

[CentOS] Apache 2.2 EOL - what is Red Hat's story for RHEL6?

Hi folks, I have been googling for a few weeks now and not finding anything. Apache 2.2 is EOL at the end of this year. Has Red Hat announced a plan yet on what they are doing in RHEL6? I am assuming they will up-version from 6.9 to 6.10 and as part of that upgrade from Apache 2.2 to Apache 2.4

Re: [CentOS] Apache + mod_evasive : problem with test.pl

Le 09/07/2017 à 13:17, Alexander Dalloz a écrit : > What does apache log? I guess it logs more than just HTTP status 400. I wonder if something is wrong with the test.pl script. Here's what I have: #!/usr/bin/perl # test.pl: small script to test mod_dosevasive's effectiveness use IO::Socket;

Re: [CentOS] Apache + mod_evasive : problem with test.pl

Le 09/07/2017 à 13:17, Alexander Dalloz a écrit : > What does apache log? I guess it logs more than just HTTP status 400. Unfortunately the Apache logs don't tell much. 192.168.2.5 - - [09/Jul/2017:13:01:27 +0200] "GET /?91 HTTP/1.0" 400 226 "-" "-" 192.168.2.5 - - [09/Jul/2017:13:01:27 +0200]

Re: [CentOS] Apache + mod_evasive : problem with test.pl

Am 09.07.2017 um 13:06 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs: I tried this on two sandbox machine, one on my LAN, one on a public server, and both times I got the same result. Any suggestions? Niki What does apache log? I guess it logs more than just HTTP status 400. Alexander

[CentOS] Apache + mod_evasive : problem with test.pl

Hi, I'm currently experimenting with the mod_evasive module for Apache, to protect the server against potential DoS attacks. Here's what I did so far. # yum install mod_evasive Don't touch mod_evasive's default configuration, just restart Apache. # systemctl restart httpd The package

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

, SELinux, etc.) But before doing that, I have to figure out a few things that work differently under CentOS. Apache and SSL behave quite differently under these two distributions. So far, Apache is running fine with HTTP and hosts a series of virtual hosts. I have installed Certbot and created

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

Le 26/04/2017 à 16:16, James Hogarth a écrit : > I'm not 100% on any differences in ciphers available, but I don't > think there should be much difference between EL7 and Fedora. > > This config gets my an A+ rating on the sslabs test: > > SSLEngine on > SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 -SSLv3 >

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

> Am 26.04.2017 um 17:17 schrieb Fabian Arrotin : > > On 26/04/17 16:16, James Hogarth wrote: >> On 26 April 2017 at 13:16, Steven Tardy wrote: >>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: The site is rated

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

On 26/04/17 16:16, James Hogarth wrote: > On 26 April 2017 at 13:16, Steven Tardy wrote: >> >>> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >>> >>> The site is rated "C" >> >> The RHEL/CentOS out-of-the-box apache tls is a little old but

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

On 26 April 2017 at 13:16, Steven Tardy wrote: > >> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> >> The site is rated "C" > > The RHEL/CentOS out-of-the-box apache tls is a little old but operational. > This Mozilla resource is excellent for

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

> On Apr 26, 2017, at 2:58 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > The site is rated "C" The RHEL/CentOS out-of-the-box apache tls is a little old but operational. This Mozilla resource is excellent for getting apache tls config up-to-date.

Re: [CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

Hi, On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 08:58:39AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: ... > * This server is vulnerable to the POODLE attack. If possible, disable > SSL 3 to mitigate. Grade capped to C." https://wiki.centos.org/Security/POODLE <...> Tru -- Tru Huynh

[CentOS] Apache + SSL: default configuration rated "C" by Qualys Labs

to figure out a few things that work differently under CentOS. Apache and SSL behave quite differently under these two distributions. So far, Apache is running fine with HTTP and hosts a series of virtual hosts. I have installed Certbot and created a Let's Encrypt certificate for the server. I

Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

Adrian Jenzer писал 2016-04-28 11:04: It looks like logrotate changed behaviour and started to delete old logs instead of compressing them. As you can see it just wiped away the one from 20160327, and that with all configs on default. Does someone know how to fix this??

Re: [CentOS] Apache logs missing

more logs. It keeps the logs now but doesn't compress them anymore. Thanks Regards Adrian -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of James Washington Sent: Donnerstag, 21. April 2016 17:16 To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] A

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 08:46 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Sounds good, but how many domain MX

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen >> wrote: > Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On Wed, April 27, 2016 10:29 am, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen > wrote: Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers have set up these fingerprint

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

Alice Wonder wrote: > On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: >>> Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers have set up these >>> fingerprint keys - 1%, maybe 2%, so how do you code for that? I guess I'm

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Tim Dunphy wrote: So what I'd like to know is it better in your opinion to install from repos than to install by source as a best practice? "Better" all depends on your workflow and your customers' concerns. If you are always available to update all your customers'

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 01:21 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers have set up these fingerprint keys - 1%, maybe 2%, so how do you code for that? I guess I'm thinking it uses it if available.

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 01:19 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 01:06 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:10 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: > Sounds good, but how many domain MX servers have set up these fingerprint > keys - 1%, maybe 2%, so how do you code for that? I guess I'm thinking it > uses it if available. So even if you do post it on your DNS, how

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 01:06 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements it. You can thank the hatred of DNSSEC for

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 07:50 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 12:41 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: *snip* Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the distribution

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:04 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Not with a smtp that enforces DANE. I'm aware of how DANE works. The only problem is no MTA outside of Postfix implements it. You can thank the hatred of DNSSEC for that. Brandon Vincent

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 12:59 AM, Brandon Vincent wrote: On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: That is the only reliable way to avoid MITM with SMTP. Except I can just strip STARTTLS and most MTAs will continue to connect. No you can't. Not with a smtp that

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:50 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > That is the only reliable way to avoid MITM with SMTP. Except I can just strip STARTTLS and most MTAs will continue to connect. Brandon Vincent ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 12:41 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: *snip* Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the distribution packages in something as exposed as a webserver ...

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

Another way i choose is install what i need in opt a php cli and configure apache. What is the different? I drive php 5.3, 5.6 side by side. It always depends of your needs. How configure this stuff on my virtual host? ISP-Config make it easy for me. Can be a solution for you. RPM isn’t that

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: *snip* Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the distribution packages in something as exposed as a webserver ... I use to believe that. However I no

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 26 Apr 2016 23:28, "Tim Dunphy" wrote: > > Hey guys, > > I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise. > > Never more than 15 web servers for most sites. > > But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the > client.I actually

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: Hey guys, I tend to work on small production environments for a large enterprise. Never more than 15 web servers for most sites. But most are only 3 to 5 web servers. Depends on the needs of the client.I actually like to install Apache and PHP from

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

On 04/26/2016 03:27 PM, Tim Dunphy wrote: So what I'd like to know is it better in your opinion to install from repos than to install by source as a best practice? Your tools should save you time. Building packages should involve three steps: download the source, update the version number in

Re: [CentOS] Apache/PHP Installation - opinions

If you need more recent versions checkout softwarecollections.org. It has more recent rebuilds of the big package suites that install under /opt and don't collide with the system installed packages. There is a CentOS specific channel in there somewhere.

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >