Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-04-11 Thread Steve Clark
On 04/11/2014 11:39 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:28 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: >> On 04/11/2014 11:21 AM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: Hello, Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names from p2p

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Wyett
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 16:39 +0100, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:28 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > > On 04/11/2014 11:21 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > > On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-04-11 Thread Phil Wyett
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 11:28 -0400, Steve Clark wrote: > On 04/11/2014 11:21 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names > >> from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-04-11 Thread Steve Clark
On 04/11/2014 11:21 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names >> from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? >> >> Darn! >> I thought biosdevname was to keep the names th

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-04-11 Thread Steve Clark
On 03/20/2014 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hello, > > Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names > from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? > > Darn! > I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! > > Update - I filed a bug report and got t

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-22 Thread Steve Clark
On 03/21/2014 06:36 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Warren Young wrote: > >> On 3/20/2014 10:33, SilverTip257 wrote: >>> And an interface should only be detected as pXpY if it's a PCI NIC. >>> THOUGH I've seen it already where an onboard NIC in a Lenovo desktop was >>> d

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-21 Thread SilverTip257
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On 3/20/2014 10:33, SilverTip257 wrote: > > > > And an interface should only be detected as pXpY if it's a PCI NIC. > > THOUGH I've seen it already where an onboard NIC in a Lenovo desktop was > > detected as p5p1. > > Just because the MAC ch

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-21 Thread Warren Young
On 3/20/2014 10:33, SilverTip257 wrote: > > And an interface should only be detected as pXpY if it's a PCI NIC. > THOUGH I've seen it already where an onboard NIC in a Lenovo desktop was > detected as p5p1. Just because the MAC chip is soldered to the motherboard doesn't mean it can't be on the P

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:33 AM, SilverTip257 wrote: > > An interface should only be automatically named em1 if it's an onboard NIC > in a (just Dell?) system. > > And an interface should only be detected as pXpY if it's a PCI NIC. > THOUGH I've seen it already where an onboard NIC in a Lenovo de

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-20 Thread SilverTip257
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > Hello, > > Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names > from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? > I'll second Les' statement that this sounds like a bug. An interface should only be automatica

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-20 Thread Les Mikesell
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:14 AM, wrote: > > >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names >> from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? > > Is this in 6.5? >> >> Darn! >> I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! > > Maybe enough folks we

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-20 Thread Steve Clark
On 03/20/2014 12:14 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Steve Clark wrote: >> Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names >> from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? > Is this in 6.5? Yes. >> Darn! >> I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! > M

Re: [CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-20 Thread m . roth
Steve Clark wrote: > > Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names > from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? Is this in 6.5? > > Darn! > I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! Maybe enough folks were annoyed with the old Sun-ism, and

[CentOS] biosdevname

2014-03-20 Thread Steve Clark
Hello, Anybody else run into problems with biosdevname .0.5..0-2 changing names from p2p1 to em1 when upgrading from biosdevname 0.4.1-3? Darn! I thought biosdevname was to keep the names the same!! -- Stephen Clark *NetWolves Managed Services, LLC.* Director of Technology Phone: 813-579-3200