Johnny Hughes wrote the following on 2/15/2012 4:39 AM:
> I am adding the i386 version of perl to x86_64 extras for c5 now ...
> it will go out to the mirrors soon.
I appreciate the help Johnny.
Thanks,
--Blake
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/14/2012 5:59 PM:
>
> BTW: why do you need 32bit perl? Since the package exists and you have
> it installed, I guess there must be use-cases... but perl being
> interpreted, I'm curious as to what they could be.
I did not install it intentionally. I at
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/14/2012 5:54 PM:
>
> yes it should be udpated.
> I was just pointing out that the i386 version you have installed must
> have come from extras, since your x86_64 system cannot see the i386
> versions available in the base+updates i386 repos that you s
On 02/14/2012 12:59 PM, Blake Hudson wrote:
>
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
>> why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
>> are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
>> and updates dir for that arch, with the
On 02/14/12 3:59 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> BTW: why do you need 32bit perl? Since the package exists and you have
> it installed, I guess there must be use-cases... but perl being
> interpreted, I'm curious as to what they could be.
usually in my experience, the requirement for 32 bit perl
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> Blake Hudson wrote:
>>
>>
>> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
>>> why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
>>> are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
>>> and updates dir for that ar
Blake Hudson wrote:
>
>
> Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
>> why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
>> are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
>> and updates dir for that arch, with the newer version in update
Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote the following on 2/13/2012 9:11 PM:
> why do you think there's a problem? if you have an x86_64 system, you
> are expected to use x86_64 perl, and that's what you have in the os
> and updates dir for that arch, with the newer version in updates. Same
> if you have an
Blake Hudson wrote:
> I seem to running into the following bug when attempting to perform a
> yum update: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5322
>
> I have been skipping perl to move on. However, I am unable to update
> perl to the latest i386 release due to what appears to be a mistake in
> the
I seem to running into the following bug when attempting to perform a
yum update: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=5322
I have been skipping perl to move on. However, I am unable to update
perl to the latest i386 release due to what appears to be a mistake in
the centOS repo.
The CentOS mirr
10 matches
Mail list logo
