Re: [CentOS] centos6 filesystem size limit

2011-01-03 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:49:44PM -0500, Joshua Baker-LePain wrote: > On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 at 1:45pm, Robert Arkiletian wrote > > > I just read the rhel6 filesystem size limit. > > > > http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/ > > > > It says 16TB limit for ext4 (same as ext3)?!?! I thought ext4 was > >

Re: [CentOS] centos6 filesystem size limit

2011-01-03 Thread Peter Kjellström
> isn't this entirely a problem caused by MBR? No, this is a different matter. > An (U)EFI-machine should be able to handle FS-sizes beyond these limits > without any hassles. Can anyone confirm this? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. __

Re: [CentOS] centos6 filesystem size limit

2011-01-02 Thread Daniel Heitmann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, isn't this entirely a problem caused by MBR? An (U)EFI-machine should be able to handle FS-sizes beyond these limits without any hassles. Can anyone confirm this? Gruß/Regards, Daniel Heitmann XMPP: maledic...@jabber.ccc.de (OTR-preferred)

Re: [CentOS] centos6 filesystem size limit

2011-01-02 Thread Joshua Baker-LePain
On Sun, 2 Jan 2011 at 1:45pm, Robert Arkiletian wrote > I just read the rhel6 filesystem size limit. > > http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/ > > It says 16TB limit for ext4 (same as ext3)?!?! I thought ext4 was > supposed to support 1EB ( ~ 1 million TB) limit. That was one of the > main advantag

[CentOS] centos6 filesystem size limit

2011-01-02 Thread Robert Arkiletian
I just read the rhel6 filesystem size limit. http://www.redhat.com/rhel/compare/ It says 16TB limit for ext4 (same as ext3)?!?! I thought ext4 was supposed to support 1EB ( ~ 1 million TB) limit. That was one of the main advantages of rhel6. After a little more digging all I found was that the u