> Am 09.02.2017 um 16:10 schrieb Johnny Hughes :
>
> On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
>> I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus
>> version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
>>
>
> The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of t
On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus
> version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
>
The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of the decision
upstream to disable ffmpeg.
The newest upstream
> Am 04.02.2017 um 13:55 schrieb Leon Fauster :
>
> I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus
> version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
>
OK, I see. The ffmpeg support is reenabled now
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330898).
This makes
On 02/04/2017 04:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote:
I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus
version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
Thanks for the effort!
LF
I rebuild the Fedora Rawhide version of FireFox with a few tweaks to the
spec file (needed to get
I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus
version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class.
Thanks for the effort!
LF
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
5 matches
Mail list logo