Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Ok, so what would you suggest is a good practice for a hosting
environment with a few different RH based (CentOS & Fedora Core)
servers, all doing different stuff?
do you have test/staging servers for each of these production environments?
without such, there's really not m
- Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 16:08:06 +0200
From: Rainer Duffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] centralized patch management
To: CentOS mailing list
Terry schrieb:
Hello,
I have been as
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
What is everyone else doing in this arena?
i would say Pulp fits the bill from what you have said
https://fedorahosted.org/pulp
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Ray Van Dolson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In addition, Spacewalk is the recently "opened" version of RHN
> Satellite and it should be able to run with CentOS. I don't think it's
> a perfect solution yet however as it still requires Oracle on the
> back-end and I
Terry schrieb:
Hello,
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
What is everyone else doing in this arena?
I investigated this earlier.
The only thing that seems halfway usable is pakiti:
h
Terry wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Terry wrote:
Hello,
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
What is everyone else doing in this
On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:36 AM, Terry wrote:
Our issue isn't bandwidth. Our issue is controlling which patches are
to be deployed and at what time.
ok, then you want option a) from my previous response. if you're the
gatekeeper of all packages that go into your private repository, and
if y
On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Terry wrote:
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
What is everyone else doing in this arena?
here's a reasonably straightforward scheme:
1) make sure yum is in
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Terry wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
>> management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
>> What is everyone else doing in this arena?
Terry wrote:
Hello,
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
What is everyone else doing in this arena?
Set up a local repo and point all your systems to it.
___
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 08:08:31AM -0500, Terry wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
> management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
>What is everyone else doing in this arena?
For RHEL, at work we use RHN Satellite.
Hello,
I have been asked to come up with a strategy for centralized patch
management of our linux servers. Today, this is only centos and rhel.
What is everyone else doing in this arena?
Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists
12 matches
Mail list logo
