James B. Byrne wrote:
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sam Drinkard wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the
software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but
learn
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, James B. Byrne wrote:
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sam Drinkard wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of
the software. Originally, I started out with just sp
Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sam Drinkard wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
> really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the
> software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but
> learned there is also
Sam Drinkard wrote:
Hello all,
I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the
software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but
learned there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me wh
Hello all,
I've been trying to get spamassassin and clamav working, but got
really confused when I realized there are various incarnations of the
software. Originally, I started out with just spamassassin, but learned
there is also an SA-milter. Can someone tell me which of the various
s
On 9/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering, rhel5/centos5 is 686, but when I went to
> http://dag.wieers.com , the packages for rhel5 are either 386 or
> x86_64. Why?
>
> Should I recompile them for 686 or is it a waste of time or it makes no
Hi,
I was wondering, rhel5/centos5 is 686, but when I went to
http://dag.wieers.com , the packages for rhel5 are either 386 or
x86_64. Why?
Should I recompile them for 686 or is it a waste of time or it makes no
difference or...
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When
7 matches
Mail list logo
