On 12/07/2012 04:56 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 12/6/2012 8:42 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
>>
>> I am working from:
>>
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-fedora-14-x86_64
>>
>> And am makin
On 12/6/2012 8:42 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
>
> I am working from:
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-fedora-14-x86_64
>
> And am making progress with postfix and mysql, but looking ahead t
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> Full Outbound Access should be the exception rather than the rule - just
> think how clean the Internet would be if that was followed across the globe.
It would certainly provide job security for a lot of firewall
administrators if it took h
On 06/12/2012 16:24, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Filtering Inbound Firewalls are generally useless if the user of the
system doesn't know what they're doing. A lot of intrusions these days
are the result of inbound policy permitted traffic in cau
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 12/06/2012 09:15 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:42:05AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have found a newer version of the howto:
>
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-centos-6.2
On 12/06/2012 09:15 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:42:05AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
> Not by any reputable repo, no. Use dovecot which is supplied by CentOS.
>
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-p
I'd throw in to the mix - I have a lot of experience with *nix's - but
limited time to learn things and must concentrate on what I need to know.
I've never master SELinux and disable it - all the time. However, my
needs are for my home network - which I administer. I have many hosts and
quit
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:30:40PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> Sorry to burst your bubble here, but note that this is from a guy that
>> says he hasn't changed things in years. The 'normal' selinux
>> reaction to problems is not nonsense, just real life when you hav
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 01:30:40PM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
> Sorry to burst your bubble here, but note that this is from a guy that
> says he hasn't changed things in years. The 'normal' selinux
> reaction to problems is not nonsense, just real life when you have a
> bunch of people trying
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:25 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>
>> I always have ignored turning off the firewall; it is not hard in Gnome
>> to alter basic firewall behaviour and allow for ports like 576 (or
>> whatever that SMTP port is; not looking it up right now).
>>
>> In the past, turning selinux
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 11:08:07AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> I always have ignored turning off the firewall; it is not hard in Gnome
> to alter basic firewall behaviour and allow for ports like 576 (or
> whatever that SMTP port is; not looking it up right now).
>
> In the past, turning
On 12/06/2012 11:13 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 06.12.2012 17:10, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>> On 12/06/2012 10:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree with.
Turning down your firewall?!
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> Filtering Inbound Firewalls are generally useless if the user of the
>>> system doesn't know what they're doing. A lot of intrusions these days
>>> are the result of inbound policy permitted traffic in causing someone to
>>> initiate a
On 12/06/2012 10:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
>> On 06-12-2012 15:41, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree
with.
Turning down your firew
On 12/06/2012 10:49 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 06-12-2012 15:41, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
>>> Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree
>>> with.
>>> Turning down your firewall?! Anyone suggesting that is, IMO, either
>>> a)
>>> clue
On 12/06/2012 10:41 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
>> Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree with.
>> Turning down your firewall?! Anyone suggesting that is, IMO, either a)
>> clueless, or b) a malware user/vendor trying to make life ea
On 12/06/2012 10:13 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:42:05AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
>> Not by any reputable repo, no. Use dovecot which is supplied by CentOS.
>>
>>> http://www.howtoforge.com/v
On 12/06/2012 09:15 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:42:05AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
> Not by any reputable repo, no. Use dovecot which is supplied by CentOS.
>
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-p
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 06-12-2012 15:41, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
>>>
>>> Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree
>>> with.
>>> Turning down your firewall?! Anyone suggesting that is, IMO, either
>>>
On 06-12-2012 15:41, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
>>
>> Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree
>> with.
>> Turning down your firewall?! Anyone suggesting that is, IMO, either
>> a)
>> clueless, or b) a malware user/vendor trying to make
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:13 AM, wrote:
>
> Disabling selinux, or at least setting it to permissive, I agree with.
> Turning down your firewall?! Anyone suggesting that is, IMO, either a)
> clueless, or b) a malware user/vendor trying to make life easier. Can
> anyone think of any other possibilit
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:42:05AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
>
> Not by any reputable repo, no. Use dovecot which is supplied by CentOS.
>
>> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-an
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 08:42:05AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
Not by any reputable repo, no. Use dovecot which is supplied by CentOS.
> http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-fedora-14-x86_64
Are there existing rpms for courier mta?
I am working from:
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-with-postfix-courier-mysql-and-squirrelmail-fedora-14-x86_64
And am making progress with postfix and mysql, but looking ahead to
other steps. I see squirrelmail is in EPEL.
___
24 matches
Mail list logo
