On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:45 PM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's face it most auditors these days are just accountants with Infosys Mgmt
text books.
Or former sysadmins who didn't make it in the management track but
still wanted to be able to lord it over others...
On 02/24/2011 02:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know
why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
The bind97 packages is in RHEL 5.6.
... and available in c5-testing, pending centos-5.6 release; so if you
want
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when
On 02/24/2011 07:12 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 02/24/2011 07:12 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
I went through this last week with OpenSSH version 5.x (not currently
available for RHEL or CentOS 5 except by third party provided
software), and bash. Turns out that
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term
stability without backports ... Unbuntu LTS is a free example. They
also provide
On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
mailto:joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other enterprise distributions exist that provide long term
stability without
On 2/24/11 7:37 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughesjoh...@centos.org
mailto:joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other enterprise distributions exist
On Feb 24, 2011, at 8:37 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 02/24/2011 05:43 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Feb 24, 2011, at 9:31 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org
mailto:joh...@centos.org wrote:
I am not saying this to be a smart a$$ or be negative ... just saying
that other
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3 when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I understand that its to maintain a known
stable platform by
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Machin, Greg
greg.mac...@openpolytechnic.ac.nz wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know
why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:08 +1300, Machin, Greg wrote:
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I
On 02/24/2011 01:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3 when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Machin, Greg greg.mac...@openpolytechnic.ac.nz
wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to know why
CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has
mailing list
Cc: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] current bind version
On Feb 23, 2011, at 9:08 PM, Machin, Greg greg.mac...@openpolytechnic.ac.nz
wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when the latest release that has many
security fixes is on 9.7.3 . I
On Feb 23, 2011, at 10:23 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 02/23/11 6:08 PM, Machin, Greg wrote:
Hi.
I have had an enquiry from the Network and Security guy. He wants to
know why CentOS 5.5 /RHEL 5 is using a very old version of bind
“bind-chroot-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_5.3” when
17 matches
Mail list logo
