Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-19 Thread Ausmus, Matt
> -Original Message- > From: Todd Denniston [mailto:todd.dennis...@tsb.cranrdte.navy.mil] > Sent: Monday, October 18, 2010 10:43 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm > > Ausmus, Matt wrote, On 10/18/2010 01:11 PM: > > Howdy, > >

Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-18 Thread Todd Denniston
Ausmus, Matt wrote, On 10/18/2010 01:11 PM: > Howdy, > > > > We’ve found the problem is generally caused by the time being out of > sync between the servers or the dhcpd daemon on one of the boxes dies. NTP does not keep them closely enough synchronized? OH, and in case you were not awar

[CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-18 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010, Ausmus, Matt wrote: > Yeah, this issue’s been brought up in the past. One of the > maintainer of FC 13 made the srpm available (I believe he > prepped the spec file) for RHEL/CentOS 5 for dhcpd 4.1. We > started looking at it and the problems are the dependencies > and t

Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-18 Thread Ausmus, Matt
ect: Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm Try find-out SPEC file and rpm source, recompile it, this is the faster way I think, if you have big issue. Fedora they released 4.1, check it. http://mirrors.isu.net.sa/pub/fedora/linux/releases/13/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/dhclient-4.1.1-15

Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-14 Thread Waleed Harbi
*Try find-out SPEC file and rpm source, recompile it, this is the faster way I think, if you have big issue. Fedora they released 4.1, check it. http://mirrors.isu.net.sa/pub/fedora/linux/releases/13/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/dhclient-4.1.1-15.fc13.x86_64.rpm *-- Best

Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-14 Thread m . roth
JohnS wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:58 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Folks, >> >>We've been having occasional issues with failover dhcpd. I went >> looking for "peer holds all free leases", and happened to run across >>

Re: [CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-14 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2010-10-14 at 14:58 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Folks, > >We've been having occasional issues with failover dhcpd. I went looking > for "peer holds all free leases", and happened to run across > , > which is rate

[CentOS] dhcpd rpm

2010-10-14 Thread m . roth
Folks, We've been having occasional issues with failover dhcpd. I went looking for "peer holds all free leases", and happened to run across , which is rated important, and is supposed to be fixed in 3.0.5-24. Looking at the rep