Am Mittwoch, den 05.08.2009, 00:55 +0200 schrieb Matty:
If you happen to have a
Solaris 10 / OpenSolaris host handy, you can use the DTrace ustack()
action to do just this. No need to muck around with interposing on the
glibc calls.
Whe have the same it's called systemtap
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Christoph Maserc...@financial.com wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 05.08.2009, 00:55 +0200 schrieb Matty:
If you happen to have a
Solaris 10 / OpenSolaris host handy, you can use the DTrace ustack()
action to do just this. No need to muck around with interposing on the
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd
Why don't you keep posting in there then?
Suggestions would be most welcome.
Foremost, you want to find out why those queries are generated despite the
fact that
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd
Why don't you keep posting in there then?
Because the new title reflects a new focus, and I hoped
to attract
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not
specifically a CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong
choice in setup?
Something I like to do when troubleshooting apache related things
is turn on mod_status and mod_info and compare the results
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd
Why don't you keep posting in there then?
Because the new title reflects a new
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Mike -- EMAIL
IGNOREDm_d_berger_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote on Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:56:22 + (UTC):
Please refer to my thread excessive DNS slows httpd
Why don't you keep posting
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:23:04 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:31:22 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
[...]
Until now, for a long time, mine wasn't doing it either.
Part of the problem was suggested by someone on the Apache group; there
are two
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:55:01 -0400, Matty wrote:
[...]
If you are uncertain where the DNS lookups are originating from, you
could always add an interposer between Apache and glibc. When the
culprit calls one of the get* routines, you could log a backtrace to a
file. Summarizing the
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 14:58:17 -0700, nate wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
Except that nscd was not set to run, it is probably not specifically a
CentOS problem. Perhaps I made a wrong choice in setup?
Something I like to do when troubleshooting apache related things is
turn on
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do
something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees
somewhere on a common host and let diff -r walk through them.
As indicated above, I already know the difference between
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:28:13 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do
something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees
somewhere on a common host and let diff -r walk through them.
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
On Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:28:13 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
Mike -- EMAIL IGNORED wrote:
If I really want to know what is different between two boxes, I'll do
something like NFS mount one into the other or rsync their /etc trees
somewhere on a common host and let
13 matches
Mail list logo
