Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-05-01 Thread JohnS
On Thu, 2009-04-30 at 13:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400: > > > Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option) > > looks like something I may try for testing in VMs. > > It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now.

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-30 Thread Ross Walker
On Apr 30, 2009, at 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400: > >> Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option) >> looks like something I may try for testing in VMs. > > It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now. > >> I

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-30 Thread Kai Schaetzl
JohnS wrote on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:17:13 -0400: > Kai, I read the Xen list and the way your doing it (the last option) > looks like something I may try for testing in VMs. It works fine, I'm converting all my setups to that now. > Indeed also I when I installed Xen I had to manually take out pet

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-29 Thread JohnS
On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 23:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > JohnS wrote on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:09:56 -0400: > > > If you don't mind when you come to an answer would you please let me > > know. I am interested to know. > > I could not find a real solution. I had to go to another way of creating > t

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-28 Thread Kai Schaetzl
JohnS wrote on Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:09:56 -0400: > If you don't mind when you come to an answer would you please let me > know. I am interested to know. I could not find a real solution. I had to go to another way of creating the network setup for this machine (and maybe others, I will see) and

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-26 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:31:20 +0200: > Thanks for the answers so far. At least confirms that the simple juggling > around of the main network interfaces is normal and to be expected. Simple test, I shut off xend and xendomains and the problem is gone. So, the problem is with t

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
JohnS wrote on Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:06 -0400: > You *must* specify the HWADDR field in the ifcfg-* files in order to > have persistent ethernet naming. And that is what I always do. Never done it another way. You may have overlooked that part in my message where I state that it works without a

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Robert Heller
At Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:32:06 -0400 CentOS mailing list wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > > JohnS wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > >> I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I > > >> add > >

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Les Mikesell
JohnS wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> JohnS wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering o

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >> I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add > >> a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or > >> with th

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 14:52 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: > JohnS wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > >> I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add > >> a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or > >> with th

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Les Mikesell
JohnS wrote: > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add >> a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or >> with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and >> v

Re: [CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread JohnS
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 20:33 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add > a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or > with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and > virtual interfaces.

[CentOS] eth0 killed when adding virtual interface and multiple NICs are present

2009-04-25 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I have a strange problem on one machine where eth0 gets killed when I add a virtual interface. It's got something to do with the NIC ordering or with the xen network script having a problem with multiple NICs and virtual interfaces. I could need some help/comments on this. Some history: I added