Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?

2008-07-23 Thread Tony Molloy
On Wednesday 23 July 2008 13:45:31 Kai Schaetzl wrote: I want to try out fail2ban and notice that both, kbs-CentOS-Testing and ATrpms, have shorewall as a dependency. I do not use shorewall and have never used it. I have my own iptables/firewall script and am happy with it. Can I install

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?

2008-07-23 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:53:49 +0100: I installed fail2ban from rpmforge and it has no dependencies. Ah, thanks, I thought I had installed an rpm earlier that didn't have dependencies, but I couldn't find the machine I did it on. I disabled the kbs repo and I'm now getting it.

Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?

2008-07-23 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Tony Molloy wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 14:53:05 +0100: you can specify noarch on the install line. that's what I did, I was just curious. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com

[Fwd: Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?]

2008-07-23 Thread andylockran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've used denyhosts. If you do have an issue with fail2ban, it does pretty much the same thing. Andy - Original Message Subject: Re: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall? Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:08:07 +0200 From: Kai Schaetzl

Re: [Fwd: [CentOS] fail2ban needs shorewall?]

2008-07-23 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Andylockran wrote on Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:43:45 +0100: If you do have an issue with fail2ban, it does pretty much the same thing. fail2ban from rpmforge works fine. It's missing the filter for dovecot, though, and got wrong filters for many other services. Here are some that I just figured