johan.vermeulen7 wrote:
> m.roth@5-cent.usschreef:
> Chuck Campbell wrote:
>> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>>
>> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything
>> saying the problems noted here have been fixed.
>
> Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I though
m.roth@5-cent.usschreef:
Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>
> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything
> saying the problems noted here have been fixed.
Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I thought I remembered folks here
compla
Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>
> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything
> saying the problems noted here have been fixed.
Dunno 'bout 5; I'd been waiting, since I thought I remembered folks here
complaining about it breaking lang
On 05/27/2015 11:49 AM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
> Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
>
> It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything saying
> the problems noted here have been fixed.
Theoretically, the language problems (except for Russian) and this issue
are fixed
Is Firefox 38 still borked for Centos 5?
It shows up as available for update, but I don't recall seeing anything saying
the problems noted here have been fixed.
thanks,
-chuck
--
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailm
5 matches
Mail list logo