On Jun 8, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> I must be missing something here, so the system comes up, ip(s) are assigned
> to the interface, routes, etc then sometime later the switch comes up and you
> ssh in. Never been a problem for me.
Even with static configurations, I’ve had this prob
On 06/07/2016 04:46 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley wrote:
I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network
connections are static.
There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big
one is that the 'network
On 06/07/2016 01:46 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley wrote:
>>
>> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network
>> connections are static.
>
> There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big
> one is th
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:20:23 -0400
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Um, huh? ssh server;service network restart is certainly faster than a
>> reboot.
>
> By what magical incantation will you ssh into a server with no current
> network connection?
>
Plugging in my monitor-on-a-stick.
On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:20:23 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Um, huh? ssh server;service network restart is certainly faster than a
> reboot.
By what magical incantation will you ssh into a server with no current network
connection?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvillet
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley
> wrote:
>>
>> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network
>> connections are static.
>
> There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one
> big one is that the 'network' service r
On Jun 7, 2016, at 13:03, Emmett Culley wrote:
>
> I can see no use case for NetwortManager on our systems. All network
> connections are static.
There are a couple reasons I still use NetworkManager on servers, but one big
one is that the 'network' service runs once, on boot. If there is no
On 2016-06-07 10:03, Emmett Culley wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 05:05 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> > On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" wrote:
> >>
> >> I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all
> > cases firewall-config is not functional.
Just a thought - CentOS7 _minimal
On 06/07/2016 05:05 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" wrote:
>>
>> I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all
> cases firewall-config is not functional.
>>
>> First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on
> one, it
On 7 Jun 2016 12:44, "Emmett Culley" wrote:
>
> I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all
cases firewall-config is not functional.
>
> First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on
one, it don't change to "checked", and nothing changes on the
I have a number of machines (hardware and VMs) running CentOS 7. I all cases
firewall-config is not functional.
First, the service check boxes are not functional. When you click on one, it
don't change to "checked", and nothing changes on the firewall. However you do
see a "Changes applied"
11 matches
Mail list logo