Re: [CentOS] fsck.ext4 problem 64bit [SOLVED]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Banyan He wrote: > I think it comes out from the app itself for the verification. The > question is if the soft raid supports by anyhow. Trying to build one > test box for it. > > print_unsupp_features: > if (features[0] || features[1] || features[2]) { > int i, j;

Re: [CentOS] fsck.ext4 problem 64bit

I think it comes out from the app itself for the verification. The question is if the soft raid supports by anyhow. Trying to build one test box for it. print_unsupp_features: if (features[0] || features[1] || features[2]) { int i, j; __u32 *mask = features, m;

Re: [CentOS] fsck.ext4 problem 64bit

Try this out to find out who complains the arch, strace fsck.ext4 /dev/md5. Post the output here that we can check more if it's from the app or the kernel. Banyan He Blog: http://www.rootong.com Email: ban...@rootong.com On 2012-10-25 5:10 PM, Steve Brooks wrote: > Hi All, > > Tryi

[CentOS] fsck.ext4 problem 64bit

Hi All, Trying to run fsck on a local linux raid partition gave the following. [root@... /]# fsck.ext4 /dev/md0 e2fsck 1.41.12 (17-May-2010) /dev/md0 has unsupported feature(s): 64bit e2fsck: Get a newer version of e2fsck! Odd as the server is 64bit running latest kernel and using latest "e2f