i figured that if you use filesystems and protocols most native to the
mac os you´ll get the best results in stability on the client side,
that´s why i thought of HFS. but ext4 seems to do the job well.
i´ll definitely checkout samba too. do you also serve homedirs to them?
had any issues?
On 03/12/2012 05:11 AM, Wessel van der Aart wrote:
i figured that if you use filesystems and protocols most native to the
mac os you´ll get the best results in stability on the client side,
that´s why i thought of HFS. but ext4 seems to do the job well.
i´ll definitely checkout samba too. do
Hi Lamar,
i tried their free version today.
at first it did look promising but as soon i was to perform actions on
files with acl's on them the whole system came down hard and leaving my
external HDD corrupted.
after several hours i've decided to give up and go with ext4
but still thanks!
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:59:31 AM Wessel van der Aart wrote:
Hi Lamar,
i tried their free version today.
at first it did look promising but as soon i was to perform actions on
files with acl's on them the whole system came down hard and leaving my
external HDD corrupted.
after
Hi all,
I´ve got a HFS+(not journaled) volume connected to my centos6.2 test
server, i installed the kmod-hfs(plus) packages and read/write works all
fine.
but since i´m going to use this for serving mac home folders via
netatalk i would like to mount it with support for Extended Attributes
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 01:17:15 PM Wessel van der Aart wrote:
so i add user_xattr and acl to my fstab options but then it fails to mount.
checking the error in dmesg just gives me ¨hfs: unable to parse mount
options¨.
does anyone know what´s going on and what i should do to make this
6 matches
Mail list logo
