on 07:54 Thu 27 Jan, John Hodrien (j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk) wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
> > I'd suggest the automount route as well (you're only open to NFS issues
> > while the filesystem is mounted), but you then have to maintain
> > automount maps and run the risk of i
On 1/27/2011 7:30 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>>> BackupPC doesn't intergrate into cPanel.
>>
>> Why does it have to integrate? It runs on a different machine. Can't you
>> make a
>> remote apache authenticate the same way as a cpanel user would to access its
>> web
>> interface?
>>
>
> Sorry, I sh
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:05:35AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> It may be crap, but a) I haven't seen any ISPs that offer shell access
>> for
>> the better part of a decade, at least, and b) consider the enTHUsistic
>
> www.panix.com - Your $HOME away from home.
>
> Of
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:05:35AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> It may be crap, but a) I haven't seen any ISPs that offer shell access for
> the better part of a decade, at least, and b) consider the enTHUsistic
www.panix.com - Your $HOME away from home.
Of course many people who want shell a
On Thu, 2011-01-27 at 10:05 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:05 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> >
> >> cpanel is pure crap.
> It may be crap, but a) I haven't seen any ISPs that offer shell access for
> the better part of a decade, at least, and b) consider the enTHUsist
Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:05 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> cpanel is pure crap.
>
> It is a ghastly and frustrating nightmare. Command line, even for a
> Linux beginner like me, is far superior. It is amazing that people pay
> lots of money to use it.
>
It may be crap,
On Wed, 2011-01-26 at 23:05 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
> cpanel is pure crap.
It is a ghastly and frustrating nightmare. Command line, even for a
Linux beginner like me, is far superior. It is amazing that people pay
lots of money to use it.
--
With best regards,
Paul.
England,
EU.
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Les Mikesell
> wrote:
>> On 1/27/11 12:57 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>>
Actually, since the original question involved access to backups, I
should have given my usual answer which is that backuppc is the thing
> It currently backs up ev
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/27/11 12:57 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Actually, since the original question involved access to backups, I
>>> should have given my usual answer which is that backuppc is the thing to
>>> use for backups and it provides a web inter
On 1/27/11 12:57 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>>
>> Actually, since the original question involved access to backups, I
>> should have given my usual answer which is that backuppc is the thing to
>> use for backups and it provides a web interface for restores (you pick
>> the historical version you wan
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
> I'd suggest the automount route as well (you're only open to NFS issues
> while the filesystem is mounted), but you then have to maintain
> automount maps and run the risk of issues with the automounter (I've
> seen large production environments in whic
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 9:05 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 01/26/11 10:57 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>
>> BackupPC doesn't intergrate into cPanel.
>
>
> cpanel is pure crap.
>
>
>
And you are any better?
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://
On 01/26/11 10:57 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
> BackupPC doesn't intergrate into cPanel.
cpanel is pure crap.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 1:26 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On 1/26/2011 4:55 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>>
>> The specific solution is 'umount -fl'.
>>
>> The general solution's a little stickier.
>>
>> I'd suggest the automount route as well (you're only open to NFS issues
>> while the filesystem is m
On 1/26/2011 4:55 PM, Dr. Ed Morbius wrote:
>
> The specific solution is 'umount -fl'.
>
> The general solution's a little stickier.
>
> I'd suggest the automount route as well (you're only open to NFS issues
> while the filesystem is mounted), but you then have to maintain
> automount maps and run
on 10:23 Wed 26 Jan, Rudi Ahlers (r...@softdux.com) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> How do I unmount an NFS share when the NFS server is unaivalable?
>
> I tried "umount /bck" but it "hangs" indefinitely
> "umount -f /bck" tells me the mount if busy and I can't unmount it:
>
> root@saturn:[~]$ umount -f /b
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>>> That won't really work. The NFS clients run cPanel and we need a
>>> way for end-users to have full access to their backups all the
>>> time. We used to run backup over FTP, but then when a clien
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> That won't really work. The NFS clients run cPanel and we need a
>> way for end-users to have full access to their backups all the
>> time. We used to run backup over FTP, but then when a client wanted
>> to restore data one of the techs first had to
On 1/26/11 5:35 AM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Lorenzo Quatrini
> wrote:
>> Rudi Ahlers ha scritto:
>>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Edo wrote:
>>>
>>> How does one mount an NFS share, to avoid system timeouts when the
>>> remove NFS server is offline?
>>>
>> I w
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> That won't really work. The NFS clients run cPanel and we need a way
> for end-users to have full access to their backups all the time. We
> used to run backup over FTP, but then when a client wanted to restore
> data one of the techs first had to download
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:41 PM, Lorenzo Quatrini
wrote:
> Rudi Ahlers ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Edo wrote:
>>
>> How does one mount an NFS share, to avoid system timeouts when the
>> remove NFS server is offline?
>>
> I would use a different approach: use autofs, then the
Hi,
On Jan 26, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Edo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 1/26/11 5:23 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> How do I unmount an NFS share when the NFS server is unaivalable?
>>>
>>> I tried "umount /bck" but it "hangs" indefinite
Rudi Ahlers ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Edo wrote:
>
> How does one mount an NFS share, to avoid system timeouts when the
> remove NFS server is offline?
>
I would use a different approach: use autofs, then the share is mounted "on the
fly" only when needed, and unmounted aft
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Edo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 1/26/11 5:23 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> How do I unmount an NFS share when the NFS server is unaivalable?
>>
>> I tried "umount /bck" but it "hangs" indefinitely
>> "umount -f /bck" tells me the mount if busy and I can't unmoun
Hi,
On 1/26/11 5:23 PM, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> How do I unmount an NFS share when the NFS server is unaivalable?
>
> I tried "umount /bck" but it "hangs" indefinitely
> "umount -f /bck" tells me the mount if busy and I can't unmount it:
Try:
umount -f -l /bck
HTH,
--
- Edwin - m
Hi All,
How do I unmount an NFS share when the NFS server is unaivalable?
I tried "umount /bck" but it "hangs" indefinitely
"umount -f /bck" tells me the mount if busy and I can't unmount it:
root@saturn:[~]$ umount -f /bck
umount2: Device or resource busy
umount: /bck: device is busy
umount2: D
26 matches
Mail list logo
