> Web servers are mostly read-only, so unless your web servers are going
> to do a lot of writing to shared storage I would simply use rsync to a
> local disk in each server, or use NFS, even NFS and heartbeat for
> redundancy will be 100 times simpler to setup and maintain.
>
> GFS/OCFS2/Gluster/
On Apr 23, 2010, at 1:00 PM, James wrote:
>
>> http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/doc/nfscookbook.pdf
>>
>> I think it'd be much easier if you just replicate the data between
>> the servers with rsync or something. GFS sounds like way overkill
>> for a couple of web servers.
>>
> Maybe you're righ
> http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/doc/nfscookbook.pdf
>
> I think it'd be much easier if you just replicate the data between
> the servers with rsync or something. GFS sounds like way overkill
> for a couple of web servers.
>
Maybe you're right that GFS would be overkill -- I know you have t
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Geoff Galitz wrote:
> OCSF2 over iSCSI is a good option to look at, too. There is also gluster.
> But NFS is going to be the mainstream approach with the best support and
> administration options unless the OP is running into some technical
> limitations.
I have a
> my impression is GFS requires shared storage, I believe there
> are ways around it, but take a look at this for setting up GFS
> for use with NFS
iSCSI provides the basic foundation needed by GFS for shared storage, so the
OP is good for that. GFS, however, is not exactly a simple technology t
James wrote:
> That was my impression from reading through the docs anyways. I've never
> set it up.
my impression is GFS requires shared storage, I believe there
are ways around it, but take a look at this for setting up GFS
for use with NFS
http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/doc/nfscookbook.pdf
On 4/22/2010 6:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> jchase wrote:
>
>> We currently have a MD3000i with an iSCSI LUN shared out to our apache
>> web server. We are going to add another apache web server into the mix
>> using LVS to load balance, however, I am curious how well iSCSI
>> handles file loc
Hi James,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:38 PM, jchase wrote:
> We currently have a MD3000i with an iSCSI LUN shared out to our apache web
> server. We are going to add another apache web server into the mix using LVS
> to load balance, however, I am curious how well iSCSI handles file locking
> and
jchase wrote:
> We currently have a MD3000i with an iSCSI LUN shared out to our apache
> web server. We are going to add another apache web server into the mix
> using LVS to load balance, however, I am curious how well iSCSI
> handles file locking and data integrity. ...
it doesn't, not even c
We currently have a MD3000i with an iSCSI LUN shared out to our apache web
server. We are going to add another apache web server into the mix using
LVS to load balance, however, I am curious how well iSCSI handles file
locking and data integrity. I have the iSCSI partition formatted as ext3.
I
10 matches
Mail list logo
