Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-02 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 02/01/2012 11:03 AM, Nick wrote: > I believe I can configure the routing table manually like this: > ip route default scope global \ > nexthop via 192.168.1.1 dev eth1 weight 1 \ > nexthop via 192.168.0.1 dev eth0 weight 2 > > This kind of thing doesn't seem to fit into the scheme of >

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-02 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/02/2012 05:41 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote: >> And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a >> script >> to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally >> fighting against the system's assumptions?

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-02 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 02/02/2012 11:28 AM, Nick wrote: > And if it isn't, is there anything I should bear in mind when hacking a script > to do this sort of thing, in order to avoid breaking my system or generally > fighting against the system's assumptions? > I would have ping the gateway of primary link (maybe bot

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-02 Thread Nick
On 01/02/12 21:06, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Hmm... >> >> I just tried this and besides needing ip route "add" default >> >> It does not seem to work when I unplug the cable on my primary link. Well, I should disclose that is an experiment, and I may not have explained the config fully - see the page

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-01 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/01/2012 04:06 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Steve Clark wrote: >>> I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default >>> route via >>> a second network interface. >>> >>> Given: >>> >>>- eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gat

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-01 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Steve Clark wrote: > >> I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route >> via >> a second network interface. >> >> Given: >> >>   - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 >>   - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on su

Re: [CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-01 Thread Steve Clark
On 02/01/2012 02:03 PM, Nick wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route > via > a second network interface. > > Given: > > - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 > - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/2

[CentOS] ip route and nexthop: the "CentOS" way

2012-02-01 Thread Nick
Hi, I'm wanting to configure a CentOS 6 server to have a fall-back default route via a second network interface. Given: - eth0 with 192.168.0.10 on subnet 192.168.0.0/24 gateway 192.168.0.1 - eth1 with 192.168.1.10 on subnet 192.168.1.0/24 gateway 192.168.1.1 Where eth0's network is a "back d