Reading the FAQ on Stratis, it appears to be a modified XFS file system
that pools freespace, but also appears to be a long LONG ways from being
something I'd do anything with other than poke at in a lab.
--
-john r pierce
recycling used bits in santa cruz
> Am 17.05.2019 um 19:26 schrieb mark :
>
> Warren Young wrote:
>> On May 17, 2019, at 9:53 AM, John Hodrien
>> wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 May 2019, James Szinger wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:17 AM John Hodrien
wrote:
> RHEL advice would clearly be not to use btrfs.
Warren Young wrote:
> On May 17, 2019, at 9:53 AM, John Hodrien
> wrote:
>> On Fri, 17 May 2019, James Szinger wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:17 AM John Hodrien
>>> wrote:
>>>
RHEL advice would clearly be not to use btrfs.
>>>
>>> I'm curious, is there anything in RHEL 8 that would
On 5/17/19 12:45 PM, Warren Young wrote:
On May 17, 2019, at 9:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Fri, 17 May 2019, James Szinger wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:17 AM John Hodrien wrote:
RHEL advice would clearly be not to use btrfs.
I'm curious, is there anything in RHEL 8 that would
On May 17, 2019, at 9:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 May 2019, James Szinger wrote:
>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:17 AM John Hodrien wrote:
>>> RHEL advice would clearly be not to use btrfs.
>>
>> I'm curious, is there anything in RHEL 8 that would replace BTRFS or
>> ZFS? I'm
On Fri, 17 May 2019, James Szinger wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:17 AM John Hodrien wrote:
RHEL advice would clearly be not to use btrfs.
I'm curious, is there anything in RHEL 8 that would replace BTRFS or
ZFS? I'm experimenting with BTRFS on one system and the snapshot and
subvolume
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 3:17 AM John Hodrien wrote:
> RHEL advice would clearly be not to use btrfs.
I'm curious, is there anything in RHEL 8 that would replace BTRFS or
ZFS? I'm experimenting with BTRFS on one system and the snapshot and
subvolume features are nice.
Jim
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 2:47 AM santhosh kumar
wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:26 PM santhosh kumar
> wrote:
>
> > We migrated from redhat 5.3 to centos 7.5 and facing crashes in longevity
> > tests
> >
> > All of them point to below reason,
> >
> > list_del corruption. next->prev should be
On Fri, 17 May 2019, Pete Biggs wrote:
CentOS is a clone of RHEL - if it is fixed in RHEL 7 it will be fixed
in CentOS 7. CentOS doesn't "fix" things as such as that would break
compatibility with RHEL.
There may be some 3rd party repo that provides a newer kernel that
fixes the issue.
I'd
>
> Gentle reminder ! Please let me know if there are any pointers for this
As far as I can see your original message never made it on to the
mailing list ...
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:26 PM santhosh kumar
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We migrated from redhat 5.3 to centos 7.5 and facing
Hi,
Gentle reminder ! Please let me know if there are any pointers for this
Thanks
Santhosh
On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 7:26 PM santhosh kumar
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We migrated from redhat 5.3 to centos 7.5 and facing crashes in longevity
> tests
>
> All of them point to below reason,
>
> list_del
11 matches
Mail list logo
