Here I have the same error, but we're using VMware. I tried to change de
type os SCSI controller on VMware and the CentOS loaded other module too,
but the VMs continues to displays this timeout erros on dmesg. The machine
just do not respond to anything, and 3~5min after, it turns back to life.
I
Hi all,
I have updated my Centos 6.5 KVM host to kernel 2.6.32-431.23.3 this
morning ... After 2 hours working, the following kernel error appears
and all vm guests goes slowly
device monif4 entered promiscuous mode
monif: port 5(monif4) entering forwarding state
INFO: task cgroup:83 blocke
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Jussi Hirvi
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors
>
>>> Is there any mention of a floppy in output of "mount"?
>> Hello Jussi.
>>
> On 29.6.2011 20.51, Keith Roberts
>> Is there any mention of a floppy in output of "mount"?
> Hello Jussi.
>
On 29.6.2011 20.51, Keith Roberts wrote:
> None at all using 'mount' or 'df -h'
Here is somebody having the same problem, though on Suse:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-software-2/linux-kernel-end_request-i-
On Wed, 29 Jun 2011, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Jussi Hirvi
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors
>
> On 29.6.2011 20.37, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> Checking my daily logwatch file, I see the following kernel
>> error:
>>
>>
On 29.6.2011 20.37, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Checking my daily logwatch file, I see the following kernel
> error:
>
>- Kernel Begin
>
>WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
> end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector ...: 1 Time(s)
>
>--
Checking my daily logwatch file, I see the following kernel
error:
- Kernel Begin
WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
end_request: I/O error, dev fd0, sector ...: 1 Time(s)
-- Kernel End -
The thi
Thank's for the answer,
That's what I was expecting.for the worst.
I will replace it tomorrow morning.
---
Michel Donais
- Original Message -
From: "John R Pierce"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] kernel errors
> On 0
On 02/02/11 4:42 PM, Michel Donais wrote:
> For monday this week I began to receive these advice by email from the
> server;
> Wht's the meaning?
> Disk read problem or else?
yes, disk IO errors of the bad sector type, on device 08:02, whatever
that is in your system. appears to be on differen
For monday this week I began to receive these advice by email from the server;
Wht's the meaning?
Disk read problem or else?
- Kernel Begin
WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
I/O error: dev 08:02, sect...: 4Time(s)
Additional sense indicates
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John R Pierce
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present...
>
>
>> In the BIOS I turn DMA off for /dev/hda and /dev/hdc,
>> but they still show up in /proc/ide/.../settings as
>>
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Ryan Wagoner
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> I hope to be be getting some custom made 80 wire UDMA IDE
>> cabl
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Shade.GE wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Shade.GE
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> Same Problem here, the harddrive (2.5" Samsung HM121HC) running with
> Kernel 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 (x86_64) produces errors on high load.
>
Same Problem here, the harddrive (2.5" Samsung HM121HC) running with
Kernel 2.6.18-194.32.1.el5 (x86_64) produces errors on high load.
With one step back kernel the errors are gone. Im already changed the
harddrive with a new one, same errors on the newest kernel.
dmesg output:
hdc: status error:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I hope to be be getting some custom made 80 wire UDMA IDE
> cables sorted ASAP. That should squeeze extra speed from all
> the drives on the machine.
You shouldn't need custom cables. IDE 80 pin cables can be sourced all
over the Internet fo
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Leonard den Ottolander
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 19:03 +, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> Well it seems likely it's beca
Hi Keith,
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 19:03 +, Keith Roberts wrote:
> Well it seems likely it's because the drive is on a
> 40-wire cable. But the kernel wants to do UDMA at 100 MB/s.
See hdparm's -X switch to override the (U)DMA mode used for the drive.
Regards,
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, compdoc wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: compdoc
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> Is it the ITE IT8212 ATA RAID Controller ?
Yes it is a card with that ITE8212 chip on it.
I had to reflash the BIOS on the card, to make it work in
st
Is it the ITE IT8212 ATA RAID Controller ?
I would suspect that raid card - the few I've tried didn't work well even
with the manufacturer's supplied windows drivers. The linux drivers might
not be any better.
I'm not sure why you distrust DMA, or if it's just on this one card that you
have probl
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Tsuyoshi Nagata wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Tsuyoshi Nagata
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> Hi Keith
> (2011/01/13 6:39), Keith Roberts wrote:
>> hde: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStat ...: 12 Time(s)
>&g
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Tsuyoshi Nagata wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: Tsuyoshi Nagata
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> Hi Keith
> (2011/01/13 6:39), Keith Roberts wrote:
>> hde: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStat ...: 12 Time(s)
>&g
Hi Keith
(2011/01/13 6:39), Keith Roberts wrote:
>hde: dma_intr: error=0x84 { DriveStat ...: 12 Time(s)
>hde: dma_intr: status=0x51 { DriveReady SeekComplete
The first error is data transmitting error. Your HARD DRIVE have
a data transmitting error or malfunction on transmitting pa
Use the modern, 80 wire cables, and trust the technology - it's come a long
way.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Gosh that's an old drive. Seems its capable of some speed, tho:
Data transfer rate (buffer to host)
Mode 5 Ultra ATA4 100 MB/s
Mode 4 Ultra ATA4 66.6 MB/s
Mode 2 Ultra ATA4 33.3 MB/s
Mode 2 DMA4 16.6 MB/s
Mode 4 PIO4 16.6 MB/s
John Pierce is right - if you don't use a dma mode, the cpu has a lot
On 01/12/11 2:47 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> I'm only using 40 wire IDE cables, and from past experience
> I don't trust DMA 100%
40 wire supports DMA modes up to Ultra/DMA 33 (as in 33Mbyte/sec).
UDMA 66+ require the 80 wire shielded cables (and both drives on the
same cable have to support it
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, John R Pierce wrote:
> To: centos@centos.org
> From: John R Pierce
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present...
>
>
>> In the BIOS I turn DMA off for /dev/hda and /dev/hdc,
>> but they still show up in /proc/ide/.../settings as
>> using
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, compdoc wrote:
> What model is the drive?
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Model Family: Western Digital Caviar family
Device Model: WDC WD400BB-00GFA0
Serial Number:WD-WMAKA1241735
Firmware Version: 09.01B09
User Capacity:40,020,664,320 bytes
Device is:
What model is the drive?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> In the BIOS I turn DMA off for /dev/hda and /dev/hdc,
> but they still show up in /proc/ide/.../settings as
> using_dma 1.
say HUH?IDE PIO modes are like 3-7 MBytes/sec and require 100% CPU
utilization during the transfer phase. why in dogs name would you be
doing this in 2011 ?
__
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> To: CentOS mailing list
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present...
>
> Keith Roberts wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, compdoc wrote:
>>
>>> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>&
Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, compdoc wrote:
>
>> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
>> From: compdoc
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>>
>> Bad sectors get reallocated automatically, so you might
>> not find any with testin
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, compdoc wrote:
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> From: compdoc
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Kernel Errors Present
>
> Bad sectors get reallocated automatically, so you might
> not find any with testing. You need to see how many have
> been reall
Bad sectors get reallocated automatically, so you might not find any with
testing. You need to see how many have been reallocated.
SMART should already be enabled, so maximize your term window and type:
smartctl -a /dev/sdb
That will show the reallocated sector count, as well as power on hours,
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:45 AM, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> It's an old drive I'm using for swap space, /var, and /tmp.
> (It's on a PCI IDE controller, that's why it comes up as
> hde.)
>
> If I test it for bad sectors using Vivard, there are no bad
> sectors found or remapped.
>
> I'm just trying
I'm getting this message in my logwatch email notification:
- Kernel Begin
WARNING: Kernel Errors Present
sdb:<3>Buffer I/O error on device sdb, l ...: 2
Time(s)
Buffer I/O error on device sdb, l ...: 12 Time(s)
hde: dma_intr: er
On Monday 08 March 2010 20:08, Robert Spangler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
> I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what
> to look for;
>
> Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
> I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
> look for;
>
> Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0
> ac
On Tuesday, March 09, 2010 09:08 AM, Robert Spangler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
> I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
> look for;
>
> Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could point me in the right direction?
I am receiving these in my log file and do not know what they mean or what to
look for;
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0
action 0x0
Mar 8 04:03:56 bms kernel: ata3.00: cmd 25/00:28
39 matches
Mail list logo
