excuse me, could you be more helpful ?
Actually I am not able to get any security update from CentOS 5.5 repo.
Is there something I must change in the repo files ?
thank you
On 3/4/11 12:14 PM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
the archive would have told you.
Kai
On 09/03/11 17:06, Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
excuse me, could you be more helpful ?
Actually I am not able to get any security update from CentOS 5.5 repo.
Is there something I must change in the repo files ?
What he meant was that you could do this:
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 05:06:21 pm Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
excuse me, could you be more helpful ?
Actually I am not able to get any security update from CentOS 5.5 repo.
Is there something I must change in the repo files ?
The kernel you're expecting is not an update for 5.5 but a part
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 11:48:55 am Peter Kjellström wrote:
The kernel you're expecting is not an update for 5.5 but a part of 5.6. 5.6
(along with 4.9 and 6.0) is currently being built and tested by the CentOS
team.
Minor correction: 4.9 is released:
[root@localhost ~]# cat
Ok
Thank you very much
On 09/mar/2011, at 17:48, Peter Kjellström c...@nsc.liu.se wrote:
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 05:06:21 pm Riccardo Veraldi wrote:
excuse me, could you be more helpful ?
Actually I am not able to get any security update from CentOS 5.5 repo.
Is there something I must
Hello,
I am using CentOS 5.5
I planned to update the kernel rpm because of vulnerabilities came out
lately.
The new redhat updated kernel would be 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5
Also Scientific Linux did and update to the kernels according to redhat
advisories
but I have seen that CentOS is still bound
the archive would have told you.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
7 matches
Mail list logo
