.1-25.el7_9.
>
> -From: "Pete Geenhuizen"
>
> To: "CentOS mailing list", "H"
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday November 3 2022 7:52:59AM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7
>
> Why not simply download the latest and greatest
/2022 03:53 PM,jefflp...@twc.com wrote:
>> 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day.
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>> -From: "H"
>> To: "CentOS mailing list"
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Wednesday No
1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day.
Jeff
-From: "H"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6:28:52AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7
On November 1, 2022 5:13:49 PM EDT, Josh Boyer wrot
On 11/02/2022 03:53 PM, jefflp...@twc.com wrote:
> 3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day.
>
> Jeff
>
> -From: "H"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Cc:
> Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6
--On Wednesday, November 02, 2022 3:53 PM + jefflp...@twc.com wrote:
A general dislike of anything that gets between the operating system
and an application potentially introducing its own complications.
Such problems are inevitable when you choose the long-term stability of an
old opera
3.10.0-1160.76.1.el7.x86_64. I check for updates every day.
Jeff
-From: "H"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday November 2 2022 6:28:52AM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] LibreOffice on CentOS 7
On November 1, 2022 5:13:4
On November 1, 2022 5:13:49 PM EDT, Josh Boyer wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote:
>
>> I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7.
>This
>> is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an
>errant
>> pointer, that frequently locks up spreadshe
I always use the packages from the document foundation, on my C7, without
trouble.
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 17:14 Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote:
>
> > I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7. This
> > is quite an old version and has a serious b
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, 5:05 PM H wrote:
> I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7. This
> is quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an errant
> pointer, that frequently locks up spreadsheets.
>
> Has anyone installed a later version of LO on CentOS
I am running the default version of LibreOffice 5.3.6.1 on CentOS 7. This is
quite an old version and has a serious bug in Calc, possibly an errant pointer,
that frequently locks up spreadsheets.
Has anyone installed a later version of LO on CentOS 7? I would prefer a
version that is not flatpa
On 11/3/20 6:10 AM, Kuang-Chun Cheng wrote:
> Mike McCarthy, W1NR 於 2020年11月3日 週二 下午7:56寫道：
>
>>
>>> Can you reproduce the problem with this document?
>>>
>>> And, when the crash happened, could you still ping the computer from
>>> another device in the network?
>>>
>>> Crashing hard so that only
Mike McCarthy, W1NR 於 2020年11月3日 週二 下午7:56寫道：
>
> > Can you reproduce the problem with this document?
> >
> > And, when the crash happened, could you still ping the computer from
> > another device in the network?
> >
> > Crashing hard so that only a reset helps is usually only possible with a
>
> Can you reproduce the problem with this document?
>
> And, when the crash happened, could you still ping the computer from
> another device in the network?
>
> Crashing hard so that only a reset helps is usually only possible with a
> kernel bug or hardware issue, not something LibreOffice sh
ous if the bug might
>>>> be
>>>> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop
>>>> that
>>>> might be responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffice and Mate have been
>>>> regularly updated from the standard repositories for a
have
>>> to force close the application. Altough the spreadsheet is rather large I
>>> would not consider it complex.
>>>
>>> This has been going on for some time and I am curious if the bug might be
>>> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the
gh the spreadsheet is rather large I
>> would not consider it complex.
>>
>> This has been going on for some time and I am curious if the bug might be
>> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop that
>> might be responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffi
consider it complex.
>
> This has been going on for some time and I am curious if the bug might be
> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop that
> might be responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffice and Mate have been
> regularly updated from the standard r
consider it complex.
>
> This has been going on for some time and I am curious if the bug might be
> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop that
> might be responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffice and Mate have been
> regularly updated from the standard r
lication. Altough the spreadsheet is rather large I
> >> would not consider it complex.
> >>
> >> This has been going on for some time and I am curious if the bug might
> be
> >> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop
>
t; This has been going on for some time and I am curious if the bug might be
>> in LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop that
>> might be responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffice and Mate have been regularly
>> update
teraction with the Mate desktop that
> might be responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffice and Mate have been regularly
> updated from the standard repositories for a long time.
>
> Does anyone else have the same problem?
>
> ___
am curious if the bug might be in
LibreOffice or if there is some interaction with the Mate desktop that might be
responsible. Both CentOS, LibreOffice and Mate have been regularly updated from
the standard repositories for a long time.
Does anyone else have the same problem
When I try to run libreoffice on CentOS 7.6 for a slide show (using my
macro that I have always used since CentOS 6.0) I get a runtime error that
"Presentation is not found". I updated then to the current download 6.1.2
and tried again - I get the same error.
If I go back to a 7.5 machine - same
Michael Hennebry wrote:
On centos 6, I've been trying to use LibreOffice to fill in
entries of a PDF with fillable forms.
In addition to all my other problems, the font size is stuck on 24.
I can change it, but whenever I so much a take a deep breath,
it's back to 24 again.
How do I stop this?
S
On centos 6, I've been trying to use LibreOffice to fill in
entries of a PDF with fillable forms.
In addition to all my other problems, the font size is stuck on 24.
I can change it, but whenever I so much a take a deep breath,
it's back to 24 again.
How do I stop this?
So far, all my searches ha
El 14/12/16 a las 10:20, Alexandru Chiscan escribió:
On 12/13/2016 11:44 PM, José María Terry Jiménez wrote:
I had this problem in Fedora 22/23? and the solution was install
LibreOffice 5.1 from the LibreOffice site.
Thank you, I have installed the latest version from libreoffice site
and every
Hello Alexandru,
On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 21:01 +0200, Alexandru Chiscan wrote:
> I have seen the the same bug (probably) was present in Fedora 23
> (libreoffice version 5.0.5.2-1.fc23.x86_64
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308700)
You should best duplicate that bug and report it ag
On 12/13/2016 11:44 PM, José María Terry Jiménez wrote:
I had this problem in Fedora 22/23? and the solution was install
LibreOffice 5.1 from the LibreOffice site.
Thank you, I have installed the latest version from libreoffice site and
everything is OK now.
But I am wondering it is something
El 13/12/16 a las 20:01, Alexandru Chiscan escribió:
Hello all,
After the update to 7.3 libreoffice (5.0.6.2-3.el7.x86_64) became
unusable slow.
For an excel file with 250 rows even a simple scroll takes a few
seconds, during that time the Xorg server is 100% working and the GPU
utilizati
Hello all,
After the update to 7.3 libreoffice (5.0.6.2-3.el7.x86_64) became
unusable slow.
For an excel file with 250 rows even a simple scroll takes a few
seconds, during that time the Xorg server is 100% working and the GPU
utilization is at about 77% (from NVIDIA server settings).
I
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 08:10:07AM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> Op 14-12-15 om 23:54 schreef Scott Robbins:
> >On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> >>I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and
> >>LO 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they a
On Mon, December 14, 2015 15:43, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5
> and LO 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are
> black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
>
> Thanks
>
>
I am running LO-5.0
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Patrick Bervoets"
Aan: "CentOS mailing list"
Verzonden: Dinsdag 15 december 2015 08:10:27
Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] libreoffice 4.4 or 5 in CentOS 6
Op 14-12-15 om 22:09 schreef Johan Vermeulen:
> Op 14-dec.-2015 22:02 schreef F
Op 15-12-15 om 08:51 schreef wwp:
Hello Patrick,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:10:07 +0100 Patrick Bervoets
wrote:
[...]
I don't think this list accepts screenshots, so I'll try to describe. The menu
is a black rectangle, if you click somewhere you see the dropdown which is
black with 1 or 2 m
Hello Patrick,
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:10:07 +0100 Patrick Bervoets
wrote:
> Op 14-12-15 om 23:54 schreef Scott Robbins:
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> >> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and
> >> LO 4.4 rpms from
On Tue, 15 Dec 2015 08:10:27 +0100
Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> Do you guys work in gnome or KDE?
Mate.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
Hello Patrick,
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100 Patrick Bervoets
wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
> 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
I had no probl
Op 14-12-15 om 22:09 schreef Johan Vermeulen:
Op 14-dec.-2015 22:02 schreef Frank Cox:
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100
Patrick Bervoets wrote:
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black
Op 14-12-15 om 23:54 schreef Scott Robbins:
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
Anyone been able to use a higher ve
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 09:43:54PM +0100, Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
> 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
>
Yes, I easily installed
Op 14-dec.-2015 22:02 schreef Frank Cox :
>
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100
> Patrick Bervoets wrote:
>
> > I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and
> > LO
> > 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> > Anyone been able t
On Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:43:54 +0100
Patrick Bervoets wrote:
> I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
> 4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
> Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
This won't help you much on Centos
I need the ability to make signed PDFs in LibreOffice, so I tried LO 5 and LO
4.4 rpms from LO.org but they are useless (menu and toolbar are black).
Anyone been able to use a higher version of LO?
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 02/10/2013 11:59 AM, fred smith wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:11:00PM +, Nux! wrote:
>>> On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3
On 02/10/2013 11:59 AM, fred smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:11:00PM +, Nux! wrote:
>> On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
>>> I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
>>> previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
>>> When ru
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 04:11:00PM +, Nux! wrote:
> On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
> > I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
> > previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
> > When run from a terminal it prints:
> >
> > no suit
On 02/10/2013 12:34 PM, fred smith wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 10.02.2013 15:11, schrieb fred smith:
>>> I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
>>> previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start u
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 10.02.2013 15:11, schrieb fred smith:
> > I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
> > previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
> > When run from a terminal it prints
On 10.02.2013 14:11, fred smith wrote:
> I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
> previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
> When run from a terminal it prints:
>
> no suitable windowing system found, exiting.
>
> Is this yet another cas
I've just installed LibreOffice 4.0.0.3 on my Centos 5.9 system. the
previous version (3.4.x) was working fine. But 4.0.0.3 won't start up.
When run from a terminal it prints:
no suitable windowing system found, exiting.
Is this yet another case of apps moving on beyond compatibility with
the ol
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> CentOS 6.3, libreoffice-core-3.4.5.2-16.1.el6_3.x86_64, running kde
>
> I had a couple of documents up. From a terminal window, I ran soffice to
> look at a document I'd just received in an email*. Looked at it. Killed
> the soffice session... and the
CentOS 6.3, libreoffice-core-3.4.5.2-16.1.el6_3.x86_64, running kde
I had a couple of documents up. From a terminal window, I ran soffice to
look at a document I'd just received in an email*. Looked at it. Killed
the soffice session... and the other docs closed, and libreoffice shut
down. Anyone e
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 23:07:24 -0400 (EDT)
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> Just because I like to see what I am going to rm before I actually do it, I
> tried this instead:
>
> (tigger pts3) $ ll ~/.config/libreoffice
> /bin/ls: cannot access /home/tdiehl/.config/libreoffice: No such file or
> directory
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
> m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know what the phrase "accessing your central configuration" is
>> referring to?
>
> Try this and see what happens:
>
> rm -r ~/.config/libreoffice
Just because I like to see
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:34:13 -0400 (EDT)
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> Does anyone know what the phrase "accessing your central configuration" is
> referring to?
Try this and see what happens:
rm -r ~/.config/libreoffice
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
I just upgraded to C-6.3. Since the upgrade when I try to start
LibreOffice I get the following error: "The application cannot
be sta
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>>>
>>> I just upgraded to C-6.3. Since the upgrade when I try to start
>>> LibreOffice I get the following error: "The application cannot
>>> be started. A general error occurred while accessing your
>>
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just upgraded to C-6.3. Since the upgrade when I try to start
>> LibreOffice
>> I get the following error: "The application cannot be started. A general
>> error occurred while accessing your central configuration
m...@tdiehl.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just upgraded to C-6.3. Since the upgrade when I try to start
> LibreOffice
> I get the following error: "The application cannot be started. A general
> error occurred while accessing your central configuration."
>
> I tried running it from both the command line a
Hi,
I just upgraded to C-6.3. Since the upgrade when I try to start LibreOffice
I get the following error: "The application cannot be started. A general
error occurred while accessing your central configuration."
I tried running it from both the command line and the application menu.
If I run it
On 27.04.2012 07:32, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> This time in the "normal" repo or also in testing?
> Greetings, j.
Johan,
I don't think this repo will be related to the CentOS project, so it'll
only live on my server.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
__
This time in the "normal" repo or also in testing?
Greetings, j.
verzonden m.b.v Android
vandaar de beknoptheid.
Nux! schreef:
>On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
>> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>
>>> Jake,
>>>
>>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>>> I see t
On 19.03.2012 11:43, Jake Shipton wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
>> sc
Le ven. 20 avril 2012 19:24:37 CEST, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit:
> On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> > I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official"
> > *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
> > yum update openoffice, I have to unin
On 03/19/2012 11:28 AM, Philippe Naudin wrote:
> I am also using a meta-package to ease installation of "official"
> *Office. It is far from perfect, because it don't work if I just do
> yum update openoffice, I have to uninstall openoffice* ooobasis* and
> then install again openoffice (or libreof
Jake Shipton writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
>> Jake,
>>
>> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
>> scale. Care to sha
Philippe Naudin writes:
> Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
>> ...
>> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
>> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
>> Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you us
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 09:50:21 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Jake,
>
> Sure, 3.5 is on the to do list.
> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger
> scale. Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are
Le lun. 19 mars 2012 09:50:21 CET, n...@li.nux.ro a écrit:
> ...
> I see this trend a lot, to make repos out of official rpms (at least
> Ljubomir is also doing it). Maybe it's worth doing this on a bigger scale.
> Care to share what exactly you are doing? Are you using any "meta" packages?
One i
Jake Shipton writes:
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
> n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
>> (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
>> yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
>
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 01:33:36 +
n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've just updated the RPMs for Libreoffice to match version 3.4.5
> (from Fedora 16). If you have my repo[1] installed simply do a:
> yum --enablerepo=nux-libreoffice-testing update libreoffice*
>
> If you have RPMs from libreo
n...@li.nux.ro writes:
> Johan Vermeulen writes:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>> * I then have a Selinux module
>> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
>> because I'd have to leave the Testing-r
Johan Vermeulen writes:
> Dear All,
>
> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
> * I then have a Selinux module
> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
> because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
>
> I tried installi
On 03/05/2012 04:45 PM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>
>> I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's
>> release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop
>> integration needed some work.
>>
>> It is much easier to install on several syste
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
> I have been having OpenOffice 3.2 for EL 5.x in my repo since it's
> release, by unpacking it in my repo folder, but I think desktop
> integration needed some work.
>
> It is much easier to install on several systems from repository. And I
> created virtual packag
On 02/28/2012 09:42 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>>
>>> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All
>>> that is
>>> necessary is for several people use packages from
>>> testing repo and
>>> report th
On Mon, February 27, 2012 12:10, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>
>> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All
>> that is
>> necessary is for several people use packages from
>> testing repo and
>> report that they are working without issues to the
>> Centos-deve
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 05:10:49PM +, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
>
>
> Several people have tested this successfully. You can even get slightly
> newer packages from here:
> http://li.nux.ro/download/nux/libreoffice/el6/x86_64/ that Karanbir hasn't
> yet got around t
Ljubomir Ljubojevic writes:
> Those packages do not need to stay in testing repo. All that is
> necessary is for several people use packages from testing repo and
> report that they are working without issues to the Centos-devel mailing
> list in this thread:
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermai
On 02/27/2012 11:16 AM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
>> Hello Johan,
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan
>> Vermeulen wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>>> * I then have a Selinux module
>>>
On 27.2.2012 10:10, wwp wrote:
> Hello Johan,
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
>> * I then have a Selinux module
>> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's m
Hello Johan,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:02:16 +0100 Johan Vermeulen
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
> * I then have a Selinux module
> * Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
> because I'd have to le
Dear All,
I thought the advantage from using CentOS-Testing repository would be:
* I then have a Selinux module
* Automatic update with yum update. Although that's maybe not a good idea,
because I'd have to leave the Testing-repo enabled.
I tried installing from Libreoffice.org before, but got i
Hello,
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:03:11 +0100 Vnpenguin wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> > On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
> >
>
> Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very wel
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 20:54, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
>
Yep, rpms LO from libreoffice.org work very well on my CentOS box.
___
CentOS
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:06:41 -0800
Anthony Lee Vanover II wrote:
> The best way to install LibreOffice on CentOS:
> http://pastebin.com/ZrsmjF9m
You forgot the helppack.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
www.creekfm.com - FIFTY THOUSAND WATTS of POW WOW PO
On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 20:54 +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
>
>
> LibreOffice rpm's exist in CentOS-Testing repository for 6.x:
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Reposi
On 02/26/2012 12:34 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> You can use Libre Office directly from libreoffice.org ... I do.
LibreOffice rpm's exist in CentOS-Testing repository for 6.x:
http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia,
88 matches
Mail list logo
