On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:28:30 -0500
> Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> The OP is in Saskatchewan, Canada. Hopefully, as a later poster
>> suggested, the Canadian government has some $ available, to contribute
>> for this project. I believe the distance
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:28:30 -0500
Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The OP is in Saskatchewan, Canada. Hopefully, as a later poster
> suggested, the Canadian government has some $ available, to contribute
> for this project. I believe the distance is much too far for WiMax,
> even if it were line of sight,
Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>>> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
>>> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
>>> station but not an internet presence these days?
>> the original poster indicated the FM station was on an American Indian
>> res
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:14 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
>> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
>> station but not an internet presence these days?
>
> the original poster indi
John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> There are some satellite internet providers that might work too, but the
>> consumer-priced versions like Starband and Wildblue have usage caps on
>> their normal plans so you'd have to work something out.
>>
>>
>
> and they ALL have very slow upl
Les Mikesell wrote:
> There are some satellite internet providers that might work too, but the
> consumer-priced versions like Starband and Wildblue have usage caps on
> their normal plans so you'd have to work something out.
>
>
and they ALL have very slow uplink speeds until you get into ve
JohnS wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:34 +0200, Michel Daggelinckx wrote:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>
It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
station but no
on 3-30-2009 1:14 PM John R Pierce spake the following:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
>> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
>> station but not an internet presence these days?
>>
>
> the original p
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 22:34 +0200, Michel Daggelinckx wrote:
> John R Pierce wrote:
> > Les Mikesell wrote:
> >
> > > It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
> > > suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
> > > station but not an interne
John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
>> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
>> station but not an internet presence these days?
>>
>>
>
> the original poster indicated the FM
Les Mikesell wrote:
> It sounds like this location is just begging for wimax or some other
> suitable internet service. What kind of place can support a radio
> station but not an internet presence these days?
>
the original poster indicated the FM station was on an American Indian
reservat
on 3-30-2009 11:54 AM Akemi Yagi spake the following:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, JohnS
> wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> Now, what about a long element yagi? Good, but not dependable.
>
> What's wrong with me ??? :-P
>
> Akemi YAGI
Now your just b
On Mon, 2009-03-30 at 11:54 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, JohnS wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
> > Now, what about a long element yagi? Good, but not dependable.
>
> What's wrong with me ??? :-P
>
> Akemi YAGI
-
How ma
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 8:23 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> Now, what about a long element yagi? Good, but not dependable.
What's wrong with me ??? :-P
Akemi YAGI
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.or
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> JohnS wrote:
>> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>>
>>> The other thing, if it is Line of Sight, as suggested by previous
>>> posters, is a VHF radio link.
>>
>> I would not bet my load on line of sight! I have seen days
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:23 AM, JohnS wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>> The other thing, if it is Line of Sight, as suggested by previous
>> posters, is a VHF radio link.
>
> I would not bet my load on line of sight! I have seen days where VHF
> (tropo)will trave
JohnS wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
>> The other thing, if it is Line of Sight, as suggested by previous
>> posters, is a VHF radio link.
>
>
> I would not bet my load on line of sight! I have seen days where VHF
> (tropo)will travel 3500 miles and days wh
yes
i would explore & consider moving the offices too, especially if you can do
what you want with a dedicated conditioned business line from old office to
new office and then send out on a reliable lower cost internet link.
maybe good pots if you have to.
like you said, it all depends on the co
On Sun, 2009-03-29 at 08:54 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> The other thing, if it is Line of Sight, as suggested by previous
> posters, is a VHF radio link.
I would not bet my load on line of sight! I have seen days where VHF
(tropo)will travel 3500 miles and days where it would not get to my
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:39 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio
> station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their
> radio
> signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the
> stati
on 3-26-2009 11:19 AM Frank Cox spake the following:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:23:31 -0700
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> If they already have a microwave link to the antenna site, it shouldn't be
>> that hard to repeat that signal to another site. They could put a microwave
>> repeater at the antenna s
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:23:31 -0700
Scott Silva wrote:
> If they already have a microwave link to the antenna site, it shouldn't be
> that hard to repeat that signal to another site. They could put a microwave
> repeater at the antenna site and move the receiver that is now there to the
> third sit
on 3-25-2009 5:00 PM Frank Cox spake the following:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:32:07 -0700
> Scott Silva wrote:
>
>> If the radi station has phone lines, they should be able to get something
>> like
>> a T1 or fractional part. Much more reliable and more bandwidth.
>
> I don't think it's available
Frank Cox wrote:
> I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio
> station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their
> radio
> signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the
> station. If the destination was closer
I would of thought that ISDN would be the perfect solution and if not settle
for a standrad POTS line and use one of the folloing;
http://www.tieline.com/
http://www.glensound.co.uk/GS-MPI004%20Broadcasters%20Mobile%20Phone.htm
http://www.pots.audiotx.com/
http://www.sonifex.co.uk/codecs/index.
Frank Cox wrote:
> > I don't think you will be able to compress a
> > radio signal enough to fit over a dial line without a lot of loss. You would
> > need several lines multiplexed together for a decent sounding broadcast.
>
> Well, that's what I'm looking into. I remember listening to streaming
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 18:31 -0600, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:13 -0700
> John R Pierce wrote:
>
> > FM quality radio remotes are usually done with ISDN lines and hardware
> > encoder boxes like aTelos Zephyr.. otherwise, its juts a voice dialup
> > line, analog lowfi voice.
>
2009/3/25 Scott Silva :
> on 3-25-2009 4:21 PM Frank Cox spake the following:
>> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:22 -0500
>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>> Can't you find a place that has both radio reception and internet
>>> service to park something like shoutcast?
>>
>> The immediate objective is to get the
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:14:13 -0700
John R Pierce wrote:
> FM quality radio remotes are usually done with ISDN lines and hardware
> encoder boxes like aTelos Zephyr.. otherwise, its juts a voice dialup
> line, analog lowfi voice.
>
> http://www.zephyr.com/
Interesting. I see that this one:
h
Frank Cox wrote:
> I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio
> station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their
> radio
> signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the
> station. If the destination was closer
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:32:07 -0700
Scott Silva wrote:
> If the radi station has phone lines, they should be able to get something like
> a T1 or fractional part. Much more reliable and more bandwidth.
I don't think it's available there. Even the next-nearest town has only
dial-up Internet. The
on 3-25-2009 4:21 PM Frank Cox spake the following:
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:22 -0500
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> Can't you find a place that has both radio reception and internet
>> service to park something like shoutcast?
>
> The immediate objective is to get the signal to somewhere that ha
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:15:22 -0500
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Can't you find a place that has both radio reception and internet
> service to park something like shoutcast?
The immediate objective is to get the signal to somewhere that has (reliable)
Internet access. The ultimate objective is to stre
Frank Cox wrote:
> I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio
> station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their
> radio
> signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the
> station. If the destination was closer
I'm looking into costs and feasibility of moving a live feed from a FM radio
station from the station to a point that's past the usable range of their radio
signal. It's a rural location and Internet service is not available at the
station. If the destination was closer or their transmitter was mo
35 matches
Mail list logo
