Hello,
I have a rather annoying issue on going with one of my centos virtual servers.
the server hosts a website using apache and mysql ,there are three
persons involved with keeping the site up and running.
and i am his root due to the fact he does not know anything with about Linux.
there is an p
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
> the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
> really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
> files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
I do not expect coders to remain 'not tech savvy'
If the coder is not willi
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
> If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
> directory structure something like this
>
> /pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
>
> /pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
>
> /pix/6/72/pix67255.jpg
Go read Knuth
One does not do that because then one is
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
>> By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
>> the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
>> level dispersion of files to the destination directories
>
> Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
> the
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011, Marc Deop wrote:
> It's more than twice as fast than the previous sh script.
In part this is /bin/sh v /bin/bash and using 'bashisms'
matter, but yes, I did not seek to optimize a teaching
throwaway
> 1- m5sum the file we need
... actually the NAME of the file, to make i
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle :
> Hello,
> I have a rather annoying issue on going with one of my centos virtual servers.
> the server hosts a website using apache and mysql ,there are three
> persons involved with keeping the site up and running.
> and i am his root due to the fact he does not know any
Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> 2011/7/24 yonatan pingle :
>> uploads]# ls | wc -l
>> 3123
> I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
> ext4 slows down, if there is too much files in same directory.
> XFS-fs is solution to fix this problem.
> Eero
Serio
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>> 2011/7/24 yonatan pingle :
>
>>> uploads]# ls | wc -l
>>> 3123
>
>> I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
>> ext4 slows down, if there is too much files in same
yonatan pingle wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Am 24.07.2011 13:03, schrieb Eero Volotinen:
>>> 2011/7/24 yonatan pingle :
uploads]# ls | wc -l
3123
>>> I assume that you are using ext3 or ext4 filesystems? Both ext3 and
>>> ext4 slows down, if there
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 7:52 AM, yonatan pingle
wrote:
> Hi, Alexander
> good suggestions, ill monitor I/O and mysql code, sounds like a code
> related issue and not a centos issue after all.
>
> it runs on ext3 ,i could only guess how to code deals with the dir,
> as it seems to be the site buil
>>
>>
>
> Do you have cahcing turned on in CMS? That could help.
>
> --
>
> Ljubomir Ljubojevic
> (Love is in the Air)
> PL Computers
> Serbia, Europe
>
> Google is the Mother, Google is the Father, and traceroute is your
> trusty Spiderman...
> StarOS, Mikrotik and CentOS/RHEL/Linux consultant
> _
>> RHCT | RHCSA | CCNA1
>
> If you are using phpMyAdmin the status page will aid you in tuning
> mySQL. Look for values in red. The description will usually tell you
> what to adjust to improve performance.
>
> Ryan
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@ce
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
wrote:
> im good with mysqltuner.pl,
> as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
> values in my.cnf according to the application needs.
>
> looks like it's all in the code and the way the CMS handles the files
> from that up
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 8:40 AM, yonatan pingle
> wrote:
>> im good with mysqltuner.pl,
>> as it seems there are slow queries on mysql and i have adjusted all
>> values in my.cnf according to the application needs.
>>
>> looks like it's all i
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:53:46PM +0300, yonatan pingle wrote:
>
> Yes Ryan, that exactly what i have done.
> he will get the log shortly and i will get some not free beer.
While I'm all for mysql optimization it's clearly evident from an
earlier posting that your disks are thrashing with insane
2011/7/24 yonatan pingle :
>
> there is no caching system, its a " home made" CMS.
>
>
You can use an accelerator too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP_accelerator
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_PHP_accelerators
Please, make a big backup before this! (I nevever had a problem,
but... why te
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 4:02 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 03:53:46PM +0300, yonatan pingle wrote:
>>
>> Yes Ryan, that exactly what i have done.
>> he will get the log shortly and i will get some not free beer.
>
> While I'm all for mysql optimization it's clearly evident
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, yonatan pingle wrote:
>
>> the coder is not tech savvy as one might expect, so it's
>> really hard for me to explain the issue of having lots of
>> files in one folder to the site owner or to the coder.
>
> I do not expect
> On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> > then, we look to the leading letter of the hask, to design our
> > egg carton bins. We place pix1.jpg in directory: ./f/ and
> > pix2.jpg in directory ./1/ and pix3.jpg in directory
> > ./b/ and so forth -- if the directories
On Sunday 24 July 2011 22:48:23 Always Learning wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 5:13 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> > > then, we look to the leading letter of the hask, to design our
> > > egg carton bins. We place pix1.jpg in directory: ./f/ and
> > > pix2.jpg in directory ./1/ and pix3
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
> By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
> the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
> level dispersion of files to the destination directories
Not followed the whole thread, but a SQL database index of
the actual pi
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 16:33 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Always Learning wrote:
>
> > If the pictures are named sequentially, why not store then at a 100 per
> > directory structure something like this
> >
> > /pix/0/00/pix1.jpg
> >
> > /pix/0/26/pix02614.jpg
> >
> > /pix
On Sun, 2011-07-24 at 17:50 -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Keith Roberts wrote:
>
> >> By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
> >> the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
> >> level dispersion of files to the destination directories
> >
Greetings,
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 2:59 PM, yonatan pingle
wrote:
> Hello,
> after looking into the website folders, i have found one folder which
> from my point of view is one of the causes for the server loads.
>
hmm... does mount -noatime -noadirtime help speed it up?
--
Regards,
Rajag
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:38:33AM +0530, Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote:
>
> hmm... does mount -noatime -noadirtime help speed it up?
Just an FYI:
noatime is a superset that includes noadirtime.
John
--
You can safely assume you've cre
On 7/24/11 4:08 PM, Keith Roberts wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, R P Herrold wrote:
>
>> By using a hash, we remove those constraints, and also gain
>> the virtuous effect for free of self-organizing a relatively
>> level dispersion of files to the destination directories
>
> Not followed the whole
On Sunday 24 July 2011 10:13:30 R P Herrold wrote:
> #!/bin/sh
> #
> CANDIDATES="pix1.jpg pix2.jpg pix3.jpg"
> for i in `echo "${CANDIDATES}"`; do
> HASH=`echo "$i" | md5sum - | awk {'print $1'}`
> echo "$i${HASH}"
> done
I know it absolutelly has nothing to d
On Sunday, July 24, 2011 05:29:23 AM yonatan pingle wrote:
...
> lately the server is under-preforming and load averages are high,
> mysql service keeps crashing and the server is hitting max memory
> usage ( so i added ram .. ) ,
> after looking into the website folders, i have found one folder wh
28 matches
Mail list logo
