On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 13:18 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 10/6/07, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >
> > Would not the dkms facility, as described here
> >
> > http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules
> >
> > ameliorate version problems? I'm not sure, but it seem
e: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If using a file system for the file storage isn't mandatory then I would go
> with an rdbms such as Postgres with the file stored in a blob field of a
> table. If the systems are in the same location and can use
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If using a file system for the file storage isn't mandatory then I would go
with an rdbms such as Postgres with the file stored in a blob field of a table.
If the systems are in the same location and can use a shared Filesystem then I
would look into getting a netraid
On 10/6/07, William L. Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe they are up-to-date now. My understanding is that there is
> > some delay after a new kernel comes out, but it should not be more
> > than a few days. But we have to remember that the whole CentOS
> > project is based on volu
Previous reply: wrong key. Sorry.
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 12:01 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Akemi Yagi schrieb:
> > > On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly.
> > >> O
On Sat, 2007-10-06 at 12:01 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Akemi Yagi schrieb:
> > > On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly.
> > >> Or take DRBD, but for it you must co
s handheld.
-Original Message-
From: "Akemi Yagi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 12:01:44
To:"CentOS mailing list"
Subject: Re: [CentOS] near-realtime file system replication
On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi s
On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Akemi Yagi schrieb:
> > On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly.
> >> Or take DRBD, but for it you must compile an kernel module.
> >> http://www.drbd.org/
> >
> > CentOS
Akemi Yagi schrieb:
> On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly.
>> Or take DRBD, but for it you must compile an kernel module.
>> http://www.drbd.org/
>
> CentOS provides DRBD. See:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd
>
>
On 10/6/07, Frank Büttner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For GFS you dont't need SAN's. You can do it simly.
> Or take DRBD, but for it you must compile an kernel module.
> http://www.drbd.org/
CentOS provides DRBD. See:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Ha-Drbd
Akemi
John R Pierce schrieb:
> Whats available for doing near-realtime master->slave file replication
> between two CentOS systems?
> Cronjobs running rsync won't cut it.
> Ideally, I'd like something that works like SLONY-I does for Postgres
> databases, where all file system block level transactio
Whats available for doing near-realtime master->slave file replication
between two CentOS systems?
Cronjobs running rsync won't cut it.
Ideally, I'd like something that works like SLONY-I does for Postgres
databases, where all file system block level transactions on the master
get repli
12 matches
Mail list logo
