Maybe you will like ethtool from now.
Banyan He
Blog: http://www.rootong.com
Email: ban...@rootong.com
On 3/21/2013 5:21 PM, isdtor wrote:
> Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
> without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
>
> # ifconfig em2
> em2 Lin
Under CentOS6, is it possible to get an interface to RUNNING state
without assigning a (dummy) IP address?
# ifconfig em2
em2 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 78:2B:CB:67:3E:5C
UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1
RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:58:34AM +1100, Nat N wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Nat N wrote:
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided
> > to
> > not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3
> > were
> >
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Nat N wrote:
> Hi List,
>
> I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to
> not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were
> bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came up OK but no
>
Hi List,
I am running a x86_64 Centos server, after a reboot the network has decided to
not work.. this particular machine has 8 eth ports eth0-7. eth0 and eth3 were
bonded (mode 1 ) after reboot the bond did not work. It came up OK but no
data was passing through it. all other interfaces on the m
Yes I just tested like this..
What i did was:
ifconfig -a gives me logical names such as: __tmp1035166962 , ethX
and ethtool -p __tmp1035166962 makes blinking in the network port. My
problem is resolved.
Thanks a lot guys. Appreciate it.
Paras.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bowie Bailey
On 10/15/2010 12:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Paras pradhan wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>>> ...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port.
On 10/15/2010 1:10 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 12:44 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>>> ...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents
On 10/15/2010 12:44 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>> Have
On 10/15/2010 11:44 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>>
>> Hav
Paras pradhan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>>
>> Have a look at the "-p" opt
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
>
> From: Paras pradhan
>
> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>
> Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
> ...
>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>
> Have a look at the "-p" option to ethtool
It would be u
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Have a look at the "-p" option to ethtool
/Peter
> Thanks!
> Paras.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
From: Paras pradhan
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics physical ports order, I t
From: Paras pradhan
> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics physical ports order, I think you will have to test them one
It looks like when there are no ifcfg-* files , then the kernel
assigns some default logical names ( don;t know how and why), but if
we create ifcfg-ethx files then it overrides it. That should be ok (?)
i think.
One more question:
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
re
From: Paras pradhan
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts.
Maybe try to have one and put:
ONBOOT=no
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Nothing in the dmesg except this:
Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.0.2 (Aug 21, 2009)
eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit
133MHz found at mem e600, IRQ 16, node addr 0024e848f03d
eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit
On 10/13/2010 5:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
> I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
> I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
>
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24
There are eight nics. But i don't get output of all of eth0 to eth7.
Paras.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/13/10 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
>> I do ifconfig eth1 I can see outp
On 10/13/10 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
> I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
> I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
>
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24
I have eight nics as below
[pprad...@cvprd1 ~]$ ./lshw -short -class network
WARNING: you should run this program as super-user.
H/W pathDevice Class Description
===
/0/100/4/0/0eth4 networkN
eth1 exists because the /dev device was found on boot (you have 2 or more
network interfaces).
eth12 does due to you not have 13+ nic's or did not map a network device to
be eth12.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/networ
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:44:DB:CC
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Met
it is up now
why it shows "RTNETLINK answers: File exists"
# ifup eth0:2 up
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
RTNETLINK answers: File exists
Thank you
--- Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> adrian kok wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > How can I bring up eth0:2 only
> >
> > "ifconfig eth0:2 up" is not working
>
use
ifup eth0:2
On Wednesday 24 December 2008 02:59, Barry Brimer wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > How can I bring up eth0:2 only
> >
> > "ifconfig eth0:2 up" is not working
> >
> > I have to use service network restart
> >
> > But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
>
adrian kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> How can I bring up eth0:2 only
>
> "ifconfig eth0:2 up" is not working
>
have you tried ifup eth0:2 ?
> I have to use service network restart
>
> But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
> want
>
> Thank you
>
>
> Send instant messages to your online f
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 4:19 PM, adrian kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> How can I bring up eth0:2 only
>
> "ifconfig eth0:2 up" is not working
wouldn't it be 'ifup eth0:2' ?
-Bob
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listin
> Hi all
>
> How can I bring up eth0:2 only
>
> "ifconfig eth0:2 up" is not working
>
> I have to use service network restart
>
> But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
> want
I believe you have to have eth0 up for that to work. You can add
"ONPARENT=no" to the other virtual interfa
Hi all
How can I bring up eth0:2 only
"ifconfig eth0:2 up" is not working
I have to use service network restart
But it restarts all network interfaces that I don't
want
Thank you
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
_
On Tuesday 22 April 2008 01:49, gopinath wrote:
> if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
>
> if i boot to Centos 5.1 or Redhat 7.3 the pc is able to communicated to
> everyone on the networks.
>
> Please help me out.
How about check the configs against one another on all 3
On Tue, 2008-04-22 at 11:19 +0530, gopinath wrote:
> When i run a mii-tool
>
> it displays no MII transcievers present !!!
>
> if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
>
> if i ping to the eth0 ip it pings.
>
> if i ping to some other ip on Lan no response is coming.
>
When i run a mii-tool
it displays no MII transcievers present !!!
if i run ifconfig it displays the eth0 its ip and Hwaddress
if i ping to the eth0 ip it pings.
if i ping to some other ip on Lan no response is coming.
This all happens in Cent OS 4.2
if i boot to Centos 5.1 or Redhat 7.3 the
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>
> Matt Hyclak wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
> >> Graham Johnston wrote:
> >>> I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
> >>> vlan interfaces, and brid
Matt Hyclak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to ac
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:03 -0500, Matt Hyclak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
> > Graham Johnston wrote:
> > >I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
> > >vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently i
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us:
> Graham Johnston wrote:
> >I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
> >vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
> >boot the system is attempting to activate the bri
Graham Johnston wrote:
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before
it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces,
vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on
boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before
it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the
bridge is cr
40 matches
Mail list logo
