Yes I just tested like this..
What i did was:
ifconfig -a gives me logical names such as: __tmp1035166962 , ethX
and ethtool -p __tmp1035166962 makes blinking in the network port. My
problem is resolved.
Thanks a lot guys. Appreciate it.
Paras.
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Bowie Bailey
On 10/15/2010 12:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Paras pradhan wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>>> ...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port.
On 10/15/2010 1:10 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 10/15/2010 12:44 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>>> ...
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents
On 10/15/2010 12:44 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>> Have
On 10/15/2010 11:44 AM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>>
>> Hav
Paras pradhan wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> ...
>>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>>
>> Have a look at the "-p" opt
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
>
> From: Paras pradhan
>
> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>
> Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
> ...
>> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
>> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
>
> Have a look at the "-p" option to ethtool
It would be u
On Thursday 14 October 2010, Paras pradhan wrote:
...
> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Have a look at the "-p" option to ethtool
/Peter
> Thanks!
> Paras.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
On 15/10/2010 10:36, John Doe wrote:
From: Paras pradhan
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics physical ports order, I t
From: Paras pradhan
> I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
> represents which physical port. Any way to find this?
Unless you are 100% sure the nics detection follow a sequential order that
matches the nics physical ports order, I think you will have to test them one
It looks like when there are no ifcfg-* files , then the kernel
assigns some default logical names ( don;t know how and why), but if
we create ifcfg-ethx files then it overrides it. That should be ok (?)
i think.
One more question:
I have eight nics and its getting difficult to me which MAC id
re
From: Paras pradhan
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts.
Maybe try to have one and put:
ONBOOT=no
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Nothing in the dmesg except this:
Broadcom NetXtreme II Gigabit Ethernet Driver bnx2 v2.0.2 (Aug 21, 2009)
eth0: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit
133MHz found at mem e600, IRQ 16, node addr 0024e848f03d
eth1: Broadcom NetXtreme II BCM5708 1000Base-T (B2) PCI-X 64-bit
On 10/13/2010 5:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
> I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
> I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
>
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24
There are eight nics. But i don't get output of all of eth0 to eth7.
Paras.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 10/13/10 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
>> I do ifconfig eth1 I can see outp
On 10/13/10 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
> I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
> I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
>
>
> eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24
I have eight nics as below
[pprad...@cvprd1 ~]$ ./lshw -short -class network
WARNING: you should run this program as super-user.
H/W pathDevice Class Description
===
/0/100/4/0/0eth4 networkN
eth1 exists because the /dev device was found on boot (you have 2 or more
network interfaces).
eth12 does due to you not have 13+ nic's or did not map a network device to
be eth12.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Paras pradhan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/networ
Hi,
I don't have ifcfg-eth1 in my /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But when
I do ifconfig eth1 I can see output as below. If I do ifconfig eth12 ,
I don't see anything which i am assume is normal.
eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:24:E8:44:DB:CC
BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Met
20 matches
Mail list logo
