On 6/13/07, Farkas Levente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
it's someting a big network raid5-6... storage where we have about
40
I saw a presentation from the guy behind mogilefs. It sounds exactly
like what you're looking for.
--
Francois Caen
___
CentOS m
James Fidell wrote:
Feizhou wrote:
In this scenario, iscsi provides the devices remotely and the server
handles the raiding of the devices.
can you explain it a bit more detailed?
The boxes with disks are now just 'disk servers' and those disks are
exported to the servers that will provide t
Feizhou wrote:
> In this scenario, iscsi provides the devices remotely and the server
> handles the raiding of the devices.
>
>> can you explain it a bit more detailed?
>
> The boxes with disks are now just 'disk servers' and those disks are
> exported to the servers that will provide the filesy
Farkas Levente wrote:
Petr "Qaxi" Klíma wrote:
Farkas Levente napsal(a):
hi,
we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create
one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create
it in a redundant way ie:
- if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:35:30PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> afaik ocsf2 is not redundant:-(
It isn't redundant per se, but it allows you to access a shared storage
(hardware that supports it or network raid as I explained in my other
mail) simultaneously in multiple servers. Thus, you can ha
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 11:39:12PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> Luciano Rocha wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> >> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> >>> Hi Farkas,
> >>>
> >>> I think a start is to look on PVFS2 (www
Petr "Qaxi" Klíma wrote:
> Farkas Levente napsal(a):
>> hi,
>> we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create
>> one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create
>> it in a redundant way ie:
>> - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole fi
Luciano Rocha wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
>> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
>>> Hi Farkas,
>>>
>>> I think a start is to look on PVFS2 (www.pvfs.org).
>>>
>>> Or maybe using nbd and softwareraid ???
>> Neither wil
Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> - "Farkas Levente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>> we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to
>> create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to
>> create it in a redundant way ie:
>> - if one (or more) of th
afaik ocsf2 is not redundant:-(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, you can take a look around at Oracle Cluster File System.
> I've been using it, for a while, and so far so good.
> It's free, runs on top of Linux, and despite it's name , it's not a file
> system only for Oracle apps, and
Farkas Levente napsal(a):
hi,
we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create
one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create
it in a redundant way ie:
- if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still
usable and consistent.
-
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 01:43:22PM +0200, Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
> On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> > Hi Farkas,
> >
> > I think a start is to look on PVFS2 (www.pvfs.org).
> >
> > Or maybe using nbd and softwareraid ???
>
> Neither will eliminate servers an
Hi,
Well, you can take a look around at Oracle Cluster File System.
I've been using it, for a while, and so far so good.
It's free, runs on top of Linux, and despite it's name , it's not a file system
only for Oracle apps, and it's part of the kernel since version 2.6.16 .
Check it at http://oss
On Wednesday 13 June 2007, Antonio da Silva Martins Junior wrote:
> - "Farkas Levente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to
> > create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to
> > create it in a redundant way i
- "Farkas Levente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to
> create one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to
> create it in a redundant way ie:
> - if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem
>
I have never done this but this is where I would start
1 - raid - hardware/software scsi/ide - depending on your money/needs
(personally I like software w/ sata drives)
2 - 2 servers
3 - network raid 1 or rsync
4 - heartbeat to switch the servers when one goes down.
http://lcic.org/ha.html
On 6
hi,
we've a few 10-20 server in a lan each has 4-8 hdd. we'd like to create
one big file server on these server hard disks and we'd like to create
it in a redundant way ie:
- if one (or more) of the hdd or server fails the whole filesystem still
usable and consistent.
- any server in this farm can
17 matches
Mail list logo
