> Really? What about SLED (Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop) or
> Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop?
Marketing terms for IT managers and non-technical decision makers.
--
Spiro Harvey Knossos Networks Ltd
021-295-1923www.knossos.net.nz
signature.asc
Descrip
Spiro Harvey wrote:
> well, if they're running Gnome, then they're
> probably not using the
> machine in an "enterprise" capacity. nobody in
> their right mind would
> install X on a server.
>
Really? What about SLED (Suse Linux Enterprise Desktop) or
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Desktop? Read somet
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 09:48:31 +1300
Spiro Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> well, if they're running Gnome, then they're probably not using the
> machine in an "enterprise" capacity. nobody in their right mind would
> install X on a server.
*blink* I run a couple of Centos 5 application servers
> A driveby waste of space post was one by a certain Karanbir
> telling someone to recklessly upgrade Gnome when this is supposed
> to be an enterprise distro.
well, if they're running Gnome, then they're probably not using the
machine in an "enterprise" capacity. nobody in their right mind would
Spike Turner wrote:
A driveby waste of space post was one by a certain Karanbir
telling someone to recklessly upgrade Gnome when this is supposed
to be an enterprise distro.
Last time I checked, it was still a free world ? unless you live in the
US, in which case, all bets are off. And yes, I
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not
> really merit
> a reply from anyone. Also if that was something that
> concerns you so
> much, what have you done about it ?
>
> >
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066154.html
>
> Johnny
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 9:52 AM, Karanbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If the CentOS devs don't have time to answer key questions such as
>> on the kernel but have time to consider fragmenting the mailing list
>> who wins/loses?
>
> What barriers did you run into when you tried to help wit
Spike Turner wrote:
perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel
and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :-
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html
Thats a bit of a dribveby waste of space post that does not really merit
a reply from anyone.
Spike Turner wrote:
> perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel
> and samba are ignored by the developers? Examples :-
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2008-October/066143.html
We are not going to rebase except if upstream does. And maybe nobody
answered that becaus
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Over a period of time, we would like to see the CentOS list
> become a
> more user help and distro specific list, with generic
> conversations
> moving to the centos-tech list.
>
perhaps that is why "core" issues in CentOS like the kernel
and samba are ignored by the
10 matches
Mail list logo
