Re: [CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:36 -0500, Marko A. Jennings wrote: > On Mon, January 12, 2009 2:32 pm, R P Herrold wrote: > > > How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought > > wanders into your head for two days running? > > Amen! s/!/ Brother&/ > -- Bill _

Re: [CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread Marko A. Jennings
On Mon, January 12, 2009 2:32 pm, R P Herrold wrote: > How about just NOT popping off with whatever little thought > wanders into your head for two days running? Amen! ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ce

[CentOS] non-restraint; was: CentOS 4 update backlog

2009-01-12 Thread R P Herrold
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote: > There are security updates upstream for CentOS (4 and 5) > and it looks like the CentOS 5 ones have been rebuilt > and rolled out. How come the CentOS 4 branch lags behind, > or are the CentOS 5 devs different from the CentOS 4 devs? > If more volunteers are