Robert Heller wrote:
> At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm setting up a new server on 5.4 and noticed this in the perl.spec file:
>>
>> * Mon Jul 21 2008 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-14.el5
>> - add two patches, which...
>> - Resolves: #435505, #4
At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:47:24 -0700 (MST) CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> > At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> > wrote:
>
> >> Is there something "bad" about the non-threading variant?
> >
> > Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor.
> > Which are
> Robert Heller wrote:
>
>> Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor.
>> Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant
>> for little SBC/Embedded systems). I suspect that either RH or (more
>> likely) the Perl people don't want to have to support t
Robert Heller wrote:
> Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor.
> Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant
> for little SBC/Embedded systems). I suspect that either RH or (more
> likely) the Perl people don't want to have to support two vers
> At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list
> wrote:
>> Is there something "bad" about the non-threading variant?
>
> Probably the same thing that is bad about a single core processor.
> Which are pretty much no longer available (except for processors meant
> for little SBC/Embedded
At Mon, 30 Nov 2009 16:16:43 -0500 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm setting up a new server on 5.4 and noticed this in the perl.spec file:
>
>
> * Mon Jul 21 2008 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-14.el5
> - add two patches, which...
> - Resolves: #435505, #431041
> - remove %%define threa
Hello,
I'm setting up a new server on 5.4 and noticed this in the perl.spec file:
* Mon Jul 21 2008 Stepan Kasal - 4:5.8.8-14.el5
- add two patches, which...
- Resolves: #435505, #431041
- remove %%define threading, the non-threading variant is not supported,
Related: 435376
That comment was
7 matches
Mail list logo