On Wednesday 05 Jan 2011 00:18:36 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:00 PM, wrote:
> > Michael Gliwinski writes:
> >> Actually, mock can build an SRPM from spec file and dir with sources:
> >>
> >> $ mock --buildsrpm --spec=/path/to/spec --source=/path/to/src/dir
> >>
> >> I'
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:00 PM, wrote:
> Michael Gliwinski writes:
>
>> Actually, mock can build an SRPM from spec file and dir with sources:
>>
>> $ mock --buildsrpm --spec=/path/to/spec --source=/path/to/src/dir
>>
>> I've been using it at least since 1.0.5, which is definitely in EPEL, not
Michael Gliwinski writes:
> Actually, mock can build an SRPM from spec file and dir with sources:
>
> $ mock --buildsrpm --spec=/path/to/spec --source=/path/to/src/dir
>
> I've been using it at least since 1.0.5, which is definitely in EPEL, not
> sure
> if it was available in older versions
On Thursday 30 Dec 2010 14:11:20 Ryan Wagoner wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:51 AM, wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
> > looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
> > essentially rebuilds srpms so to u
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:11 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 00:20 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> > Which Version Number? There are a few of them already patched from F12
>> > to Rawhide. No I do not have anything to do with CentOS Extras but I
>> > have the currious mind.
>>
>> I'
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 00:20 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> > Which Version Number? There are a few of them already patched from F12
> > to Rawhide. No I do not have anything to do with CentOS Extras but I
> > have the currious mind.
>
> I'm using the mock-1.0.14 from "epel-testing", that has
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, JohnS wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 22:14 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>
>> I'd love to see it backported to CentOS 'extras' or 'build' setups.
>> It's a better tool and supports more releases, including hooks now for
>> CentOS 6 when it is published. (The ho
On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 22:14 -0500, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> I'd love to see it backported to CentOS 'extras' or 'build' setups.
> It's a better tool and supports more releases, including hooks now for
> CentOS 6 when it is published. (The hooks assume that CentOS 6 will
> live in the same locat
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lucian wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> Better behavior with extensive autofs tables. (Older mock, in my
>> experience, gets very confused and starts force unmounting direct
>> automount targets in the midst of processing, which
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> Better behavior with extensive autofs tables. (Older mock, in my
> experience, gets very confused and starts force unmounting direct
> automount targets in the midst of processing, which is *nasty* and
> disables my home directory in my fa
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Lucian wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>> You can do it inside the mock chroot cage. I do, on occasion. The
>> difficult is that I find myself wanting things like emacs to edit code
>> and patches, RCS to manage versions of my new
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> You can do it inside the mock chroot cage. I do, on occasion. The
> difficult is that I find myself wanting things like emacs to edit code
> and patches, RCS to manage versions of my new .spec files, and
> unpredictable dependencies as I wr
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 13:51 +, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
>> As far as I could read about it, mock
>> essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical"
>> build environment to create those srpms in th
On 12/30/2010 05:51 AM, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
> looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
> essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical"
> build environment to creat
Ryan Wagoner writes:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:51 AM, wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
>> looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
>> essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classi
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 13:51 +, n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
> As far as I could read about it, mock
> essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical"
> build environment to create those srpms in the first place.
> Am I right or did I get something terribly wrong?
Si
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:51 AM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
> looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
> essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical"
> build environment to c
Hi,
Been recently more and more tempted to use mock for building rpms, but
looking at it I have one problem. As far as I could read about it, mock
essentially rebuilds srpms so to use it I would need a separate "classical"
build environment to create those srpms in the first place.
Am I right o
18 matches
Mail list logo
