Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5 (mystery solved, kind of)

2007-10-10 Thread jlee
Andy Harrison wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: As for 'critical apps that require' nscd...I don't personally know of any and if we are talking about CentOS-5 which has 2.3.27 version of openldap...the 2.3.x versions are very fast and I'm n

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 14:54 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: > > > > user accounts in ldap > > > > accounts < 500 in /etc/passwd > > Could you provide some more detail? Until I rig up nscd, when I look >

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: > > user accounts in ldap > > accounts < 500 in /etc/passwd Could you provide some more detail? Until I rig up nscd, when I look at an nfs volume, I see nothing but uid's and gid's for the file ownership. Asid

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 14:28 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: > > obviously, I don't understand the question because I have users mounting > > both their home directories and the common files via NFS and I don't

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: > obviously, I don't understand the question because I have users mounting > both their home directories and the common files via NFS and I don't use > nscd... > But do the user accounts exist in the local passwd fi

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 14:20 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: > > As for 'critical apps that require' nscd...I don't personally know of > > any and if we are talking about CentOS-5 which has 2.3.27 version of > > o

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/10/07, Craig White wrote: > As for 'critical apps that require' nscd...I don't personally know of > any and if we are talking about CentOS-5 which has 2.3.27 version of > openldap...the 2.3.x versions are very fast and I'm not certain that > ns

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 10:19 -0500, jlee wrote: > > Craig White wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> > >> > >> On 10/9/07, jlee wrote: > >>> output from /var/log/messages > >>> Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kern

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread jlee
Craig White wrote: On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/9/07, jlee wrote: output from /var/log/messages Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kernel: nscd[11660]: segfault at 002b401fee8b rip 00552aab7966 rsp 408029e0

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Craig White
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 08:16 -0400, Andy Harrison wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On 10/9/07, jlee wrote: > > output from /var/log/messages > > Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kernel: nscd[11660]: segfault at 002b401fee8b rip > > 00552aab7966 rsp 408029e0 e

Re: [CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-10 Thread Andy Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/9/07, jlee wrote: > output from /var/log/messages > Oct 9 12:56:38 lyra kernel: nscd[11660]: segfault at 002b401fee8b rip > 00552aab7966 rsp 408029e0 error 4 > Oct 9 13:16:38 lyra kernel: nscd[12540]: segfault at 002b401

[CentOS] nscd segfaulting on centos 4.5

2007-10-09 Thread jlee
Does anyone know if there is a fix for nscd segfaulting after a short period of time. Googling for it came up with one result that suggested deleting the files in /var/db/nscd , but that didn't help. Another result was about run away processes which is not the problem I'm having. They are x86_6