On Tue, 2008-11-18 at 00:54 -0500, Ed Donahue wrote:
>
I don't know if this applies to the specific OP issue, but a recent
thread here
http://lists.rpmforge.net/pipermail/users/2008-November/002056.html
touches on similar issues.
I post because I thought it might be generally useful to the po
64-bit flash is here, well alpha stage:
http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/flashplayer10/
Here is what I did:
yum remove flash-plugin
mozilla-plugin-config -i -f -v (might not be necessary)
Deleted this one /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so
placed libflashplayer.so (64-bi
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 4:57 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Good luck with that! Have you tried it on a VMWare Server?
>
> No, why would I do that?
>
> I uninstalled nspluginwrapper and mplayerplug-in reinstalled
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good luck with that! Have you tried it on a VMWare Server?
No, why would I do that?
I uninstalled nspluginwrapper and mplayerplug-in reinstalled the
64-bit Seamonkey, then reinstalled all the plugins. Everything is
ins
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 2:16 AM, Mark Hull-Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, the 32-bit 1.1.11 release just blew up again when I tried to
> save a page I was editing. Same old bug, again, only now I don't have a
> working version of the 64-bit browser because the nspluginwrapper is
On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:33 -0500, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:41 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Isn't that what the Anonymizer is for?
>
> I was referring to your need to save web pages, when paying bils,
> online orders, etc. That works perfectly
> for me with Fir
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 4:41 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Possibly use 32 bit Firefox,
>> when you are paying bills or placing an online order or dealing with
>> the IRS?
>
> Isn't that what the Anonymizer is for?
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Possibly use 32 bit Firefox,
> when you are paying bills or placing an online order or dealing with
> the IRS?
Isn't that what the Anonymizer is for?
;^)
mhr
___
CentOS mailin
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:28 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS
>>
>> I think everything on that page is 32 bit and I think I have read in
>> this ML that it is b
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS
>
> I think everything on that page is 32 bit and I think I have read in
> this ML that it is better to use
> 32 bit for multimedia stuff? Not sure if I remember that
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:24 PM, Alexander Kirillov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have no problems with 32-bit flash and 64-bit mplayer plugins in 64-bit
> Firefox.
> Haven't tried adobe acrobat yet.
>
> For flash plugin to work with 64-bit browser you need to install
> both x86_64 and i386 vers
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 4:01 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:18 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I was wondering if anyone else had this problem.
>>
>> I run CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on my workstation at home. Since 5.2 came out
>> with nepluginwrapper bundled
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:22 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I am running the 32 bit kernel on my Desktop and I do *NOT* have that
>> problem.
>
> Of course not - nspluginwrapper is a 64-bit mozilla plugin that wra
I run CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on my workstation at home. Since 5.2 came out
with nepluginwrapper bundled into it, none of my plugins work. I
thought it was just a problem with the flash plugin, but neither the
mplayerplug-in plugins nor the adobe acrobat reader plugin work,
either.
I have no problem
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Lanny Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am running the 32 bit kernel on my Desktop and I do *NOT* have that
> problem.
Of course not - nspluginwrapper is a 64-bit mozilla plugin that wraps
32-bit plugins so they'll work with a 64-bit browser. :-)
> Possibl
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:18 PM, MHR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone else had this problem.
>
> I run CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on my workstation at home. Since 5.2 came out
> with nepluginwrapper bundled into it, none of my plugins work. I
> thought it was just a problem with the
I was wondering if anyone else had this problem.
I run CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on my workstation at home. Since 5.2 came out
with nepluginwrapper bundled into it, none of my plugins work. I
thought it was just a problem with the flash plugin, but neither the
mplayerplug-in plugins nor the adobe acroba
17 matches
Mail list logo
