On 11/11/2014 23:43, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Chris Beattie wrote:
On 11/11/2014 2:27 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
Buy second NIC and then the original script Jack Baily provided would work.
I'm outside my area of expertise here, but is there a reason you couldn't fake
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Chris Beattie wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 2:27 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
>> Buy second NIC and then the original script Jack Baily provided would work.
>
> I'm outside my area of expertise here, but is there a reason you couldn't
> fake a second network card by assigning
On 11/11/2014 2:27 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> Buy second NIC and then the original script Jack Baily provided would work.
I'm outside my area of expertise here, but is there a reason you couldn't fake
a second network card by assigning two IP addresses to the one interface?
I recall that the OP ha
On 11/11/2014 02:15 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox
wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
I think that is a different scenario, thoug
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600
>>> Les Mikesell wrote:
>>>
I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subne
On 11/11/2014 12:44 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet
addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one
NIC
Yes.
C
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet
>> addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one
>> NIC
>
> Yes.
Can you tell where the packets a
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:12:58 -0600
Les Mikesell wrote:
> I think that is a different scenario, though. Since the subnet
> addresses are the same for both routers, the OP must only have one
> NIC
Yes.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
_
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:53 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
> On 11/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
>>
>> On 11/10/2014 2:11 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>>
>>> I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable
>>> service is 192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is
>>> 1
On 11/10/2014 05:38 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
On 11/10/2014 2:11 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is
192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I
determine which service my computers communicate throug
On 11/10/2014 2:11 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is
192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I
determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway
assignment to eith
On 11/10/2014 02:11 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
However, the outside ssh connection works only if the computer's gateway
assignment matches the router that I'm connecting to. I suspect that I have to
set up some sort of routing assignment to tell the computer to reply to the
gateway that the ssh con
I have both cable and dsl service. The router attached to the cable service is
192.168.0.1 and the router attached to the dsl service is 192.168.0.254. I
determine which service my computers communicate through by setting the gateway
assignment to either of those addresses and it just works.
13 matches
Mail list logo