On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Among the repos listed on
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I've been using
> LinuxTECH.NET for MP3, vlc, and related packages with success. Between
> EPEL and LinuxTECH.NET, I've been able to replace most of what I
>
Chris wrote:
> On 04/17/2014 06:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
>> Among the repos listed on
>> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I've been using
>> LinuxTECH.NET for MP3, vlc, and related packages with success. Between
>> EPEL and LinuxTECH.NET, I've been able to replace most of w
On 04/17/2014 06:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote:
> Among the repos listed on
> http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories I've been using
> LinuxTECH.NET for MP3, vlc, and related packages with success. Between
> EPEL and LinuxTECH.NET, I've been able to replace most of what I
> formerl
On 04/17/2014 09:10 AM, Chris wrote:
> On 04/16/2014 07:27 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> I will take that a step further. Do not use repoforge / rpmforge at
>> all. There are still major issues with updates from that repo. As in
>> "what updates?".
> Where do you get packages for multimedia, es
On 04/16/2014 07:27 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> I will take that a step further. Do not use repoforge / rpmforge at
> all. There are still major issues with updates from that repo. As in
> "what updates?".
Where do you get packages for multimedia, especially MP3, from?
--
Chris
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:33:34AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Nux - hey, is that our listmember's repo?
Yes.
> And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have
> conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging. We use the epel and
> rpmfusion repos; I have, for systems wi
On 04/16/2014 05:58 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Chris, you get faster and better support when you
> direct your requests to the right list, eg. [1], [2], etc.
>
> [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-users
> [2] RPMForge is now RepoForge: http://repoforge.org/faq/
http://lists
On 04/16/2014 05:33 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> And no, do *NOT* use epel and repoforge - they very frequently have
> conflicts, due to prerequisites of packaging. We use the epel and
> rpmfusion repos; I have, for systems with some nvidia cards, elrepo, but I
> *only* pull kmod-nvidia from there
Am 16.04.2014 um 17:26 schrieb Chris :
> On 04/15/2014 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> if you really want to update libmodplug you'll have to get
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad from another repo.
>> I use the nux-dextop for multimedia now instead of repoforge.
>
> I don't know ... nux-dextop s
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:33:34AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > On 04/15/2014 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> >> if you really want to update libmodplug you'll have to get
> >> gstreamer-plugins-bad from another repo.
> >> I use the nux-dextop for multimedia now instead
Chris wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
>> if you really want to update libmodplug you'll have to get
>> gstreamer-plugins-bad from another repo.
>> I use the nux-dextop for multimedia now instead of repoforge.
>
> I don't know ... nux-dextop seems to be a smaller repo ..
On 04/15/2014 12:40 PM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote:
> if you really want to update libmodplug you'll have to get
> gstreamer-plugins-bad from another repo.
> I use the nux-dextop for multimedia now instead of repoforge.
I don't know ... nux-dextop seems to be a smaller repo ...
Am I the only one
On 04/14/2014 06:40 PM, Chris wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> there's a security update for libmodplug:
> This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package.
> This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on
> 2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574,
Dear All,
there's a security update for libmodplug:
This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package.
This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on
2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574,
CVE-2011-1761).
I've the following priorities
14 matches
Mail list logo
