Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-25 Thread Markus Falb
On 24.6.2012 20:58, Steve Clark wrote: > On 06/24/2012 12:24 PM, ken wrote: >> # df -H >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on >> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-lvroot >> 31G12G18G 39% / >> /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-lvtmp >> 195

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread ken
On 06/24/2012 12:47 PM Keith Roberts wrote: > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote: > *snip* > >> > Yeah, the problem is more than likely in your hardware. I've used it on >> > hundreds of machines and since 1999 and never had a problem traceable to >> > LVM. On the other hand, I've seen a lot of di

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread ken
On 06/24/2012 12:42 PM Keith Roberts wrote: > > > OK. But what about a drive that is already partitioned with > live data on it. Is it easy to make that work with LVM, or > does it mean I have to do a fresh installation to use LVM? Keith, AFAIK, you'd need to have spare disk space (which m

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Nikolaos Milas wrote: To: CentOS mailing list From: Nikolaos Milas Subject: Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2] On 24/6/2012 7:47 μμ, Keith Roberts wrote: And what happens then in that situation - do you loose any more data

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Steve Clark
On 06/24/2012 12:24 PM, ken wrote: > > On 06/24/2012 12:04 PM Steve Clark wrote: >> On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote: >>> On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote: On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've > h

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Nikolaos Milas
On 24/6/2012 7:47 μμ, Keith Roberts wrote: > And what happens then in that situation - do you loose any > more data than you would loose with 'standard' primary and > extended logical partitions, or does using LVM help in > recovering more data from a bad disk? Read: http://serverfault.com/questi

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote: *snip* > Yeah, the problem is more than likely in your hardware. I've used it on > hundreds of machines and since 1999 and never had a problem traceable to > LVM. On the other hand, I've seen a lot of disks go bad. And what happens then in that situation - do you

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Keith Roberts
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, ken wrote: > It helps during their creation, rather than just accepting the defaults, > to give the LVs meaningful names. But even if you don't: > > # df -H > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-lvroot > 3

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread ken
On 06/24/2012 12:04 PM Steve Clark wrote: > On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote: >> On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote: >>> On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Steve Clark
On 06/24/2012 11:21 AM, ken wrote: > On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote: >> On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: >>> And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've >>> had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens. >> I would look for some other

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread ken
On 06/24/2012 09:41 AM Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've >> had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens. > > I would look for some other issue like bad hardware. Over the last

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
On 06/24/2012 03:41 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote: > On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: >> And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've >> had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens. > > I would look for some other issue like bad hardware. Over the l

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Benjamin Franz
On 06/24/2012 12:05 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: > And what do you do when this LVM goes corrupt in about a month? I've > had it self destruct on me twice. I hate it when that happens. I would look for some other issue like bad hardware. Over the last several years I've routinely used LVM for pretty

Re: [CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-24 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:03:53 ken did opine: > On 06/23/2012 05:36 PM Keith Roberts wrote: > > > > > > IIRC that happened a some years ago with Ubuntu. > > Ever since that happened I've been wary of the various > > different custom options available from different Linux > > distros. I just

[CentOS] partitions vs. LVs [was: Re: How to upgrade from 5.8 to 6.2]

2012-06-23 Thread ken
On 06/23/2012 05:36 PM Keith Roberts wrote: > > > IIRC that happened a some years ago with Ubuntu. > Ever since that happened I've been wary of the various > different custom options available from different Linux > distros. I just use the Gparted Live CD to do any partition > work. I don't us