Re: [CentOS] passing alias addresses

2009-07-16 Thread Les Mikesell
Jerry Geis wrote: > hi all, > > When using the alias address scheme, > like eth1:0 on a machine ... things are working. > When that interface is disabled on box A and becomes active on box B > what should Box B do to correctly update the ARP tables external to box B > so the external world knows h

Re: [CentOS] passing alias addresses

2009-07-16 Thread Michael Calizo
Although this not directly to answer your question but I think you can try haproxy implementation. Very easy to setup. http://haproxy.1wt.eu/ mike -- On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:58 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 15:53, Jerry Geis wrote: > > When that interface is

Re: [CentOS] passing alias addresses

2009-07-16 Thread Filipe Brandenburger
Hi, On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 15:53, Jerry Geis wrote: > When that interface is disabled on box A and becomes active on box B > what should Box B do to correctly update the ARP tables external to box B > so the external world knows how to get to the new destination and not > the old box A? You can

[CentOS] passing alias addresses

2009-07-16 Thread Jerry Geis
hi all, When using the alias address scheme, like eth1:0 on a machine ... things are working. When that interface is disabled on box A and becomes active on box B what should Box B do to correctly update the ARP tables external to box B so the external world knows how to get to the new destination