> ah, ok. so, did you get the same errors as the rpm command or
> something else??
I tried both and they both seemed to do the same thing. I'm not at
work now so don't have all the details but it did not tell me which
packages I needed. In the end I just installed the PG repo and that
fixed th
On 11/15/11 2:15 PM, Dale Dellutri wrote:
>> > did yum say what specific packages it needed ? I'm pretty sure you have
>> > to use 'yum localinstall' to install from an rpm file, and not just
>> > 'install'...
> from man yum:
>* localinstall rpmfile1 [rpmfile2] [...]
> (maintained for
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:04 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 11/15/11 1:12 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
>> Thanks for the quick reponses guys - tried that and it still does not
>> work which tells me I need those PG repos afterall, I guess. No
>> biggie. My desired for a "clean" system has been smashed,
On 11/15/11 1:12 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reponses guys - tried that and it still does not
> work which tells me I need those PG repos afterall, I guess. No
> biggie. My desired for a "clean" system has been smashed, but I'll
> live :-)
did yum say what specific packages it
Thanks for the quick reponses guys - tried that and it still does not
work which tells me I need those PG repos afterall, I guess. No
biggie. My desired for a "clean" system has been smashed, but I'll
live :-)
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> I searched the list archives and I found one answer to this which
> suggested I should install the PG yum repos. I don't like that
> answer for reasons which follow.
>
> I'm running Centos 6.0 freshly installed, and I've decided that with
> th
On 11/15/11 12:46 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
> [root@cc-bc4d99dffae2 ~]# rpm --install pgadmin3-1.12.2-1.rhel6.i686.rpm
> warning: pgadmin3-1.12.2-1.rhel6.i686.rpm: Header V4 DSA/SHA1
> Signature, key ID 442df0f8: NOKEY
> error: Failed dependencies:
> libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 is needed by pgadmin3-1.1
I searched the list archives and I found one answer to this which
suggested I should install the PG yum repos. I don't like that
answer for reasons which follow.
I'm running Centos 6.0 freshly installed, and I've decided that with
this box I'm sticking as much as possible to just the CentOS repo
8 matches
Mail list logo