we have close to 50 servers. I would like to have X11 libraries (and
devel). Instead of installing them one by one on all servers, I would like
to have them in a central NFS location and have my app pick them up like
that. Is it possible to do this with yum/rpm ?
--
--- Get your facts first, t
On 16/09/12 22:29, Rita wrote:
> we have close to 50 servers. I would like to have X11 libraries (and
> devel). Instead of installing them one by one on all servers, I would like
> to have them in a central NFS location and have my app pick them up like
> that. Is it possible to do this with yum/rp
On 09/18/2012 05:12 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> Puppet, Chef, or Bcfg2 could do it but it will probably take you a long
> time to get your head around those beasts, let alone setting up the
> infrastructure.
>
I dont know about that - it took me about 20 min to get my head around
the basic 'typ
Am 18.09.2012 um 10:18 schrieb Karanbir Singh:
> On 09/18/2012 05:12 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>> Puppet, Chef, or Bcfg2 could do it but it will probably take you a long
>> time to get your head around those beasts, let alone setting up the
>> infrastructure.
>>
>
> I dont know about that - it
Am 18.09.2012 um 06:12 schrieb Kahlil Hodgson:
> On 16/09/12 22:29, Rita wrote:
>> we have close to 50 servers. I would like to have X11 libraries (and
>> devel). Instead of installing them one by one on all servers, I would like
>> to have them in a central NFS location and have my app pick them u
On 18/09/12 18:18, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 05:12 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>> Puppet, Chef, or Bcfg2 could do it but it will probably take you a long
>> time to get your head around those beasts, let alone setting up the
>> infrastructure.
>>
> I dont know about that - it took me abo
On 09/18/2012 03:56 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
> I had a look at Puppet early this year, planning to migrate to it from
> existing Bcfg2 set up.
Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration? I use bcfg2,
and the idea of using a system that doesn't feature reporting,
interactive mode,
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/18/2012 03:56 AM, Kahlil Hodgson wrote:
>> I had a look at Puppet early this year, planning to migrate to it from
>> existing Bcfg2 set up.
>
> Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration?
And has anyone looked at salt (h
On 09/20/2012 09:08 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> And has anyone looked at salt (http://saltstack.org/) yet?
I've looked at its documentation and talked to a few users. As far as I
can tell, it has fewer features than bcfg2 -- including no "diff" function.
___
On 09/20/2012 04:47 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Out of curiosity, what features motivated the migration? I use bcfg2,
> and the idea of using a system that doesn't feature reporting,
> interactive mode, or a "diff" from the running system is... difficult.
you should look at puppet, since it do
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch
> more - add in mcollective and theforeman to the mix, and you have quite
> a nice provision, manage and maintain environ ( I'd say add zabbix,
> while keeping an eye
On 09/20/2012 03:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch
> more
So I'd log in to a client managed by puppet and type what to see a
'diff' style report indicating how the puppet master would modify the
system?
___
On 09/21/2012 12:02 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 09/20/2012 03:07 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> you should look at puppet, since it does all of those things and a bunch
>> more
>
> So I'd log in to a client managed by puppet and type what to see a
> 'diff' style report indicating how the puppet
13 matches
Mail list logo
