Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:45:07 +0200: > they are there. may be you should have to check it again:-) you are right, I didn't get it with yum list. Kai ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 04/13/2011 04:45 AM, Farkas Levente wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:15, Kai Schaetzl wrote: >> Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:36:15 +0200: >> >>> these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release): >> they are not there, check the official repo, rsyncing without del

Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Farkas Levente
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 11:15, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:36:15 +0200: > >> these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release): > they are not there, check the official repo, rsyncing without delete flag? they are there. may be you should have to

Re: [CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Farkas Levente wrote on Wed, 13 Apr 2011 00:36:15 +0200: > these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release): they are not there, check the official repo, rsyncing without delete flag? > these shouldn't have to be there (they are already in os): what do you mean by that? Of course, t

[CentOS] problems in centos-5.6

2011-04-12 Thread Farkas Levente
hi, i try to collect the problems, bugs and 'strange' things in current centos-5.6 release: os/i386 these shouldn't have to be there (they are from older release): kmod-gfs-0.1.34-12 kmod-gfs-PAE-0.1.34-12 kmod-gfs-xen-0.1.34-12 centos-release-notes-5.5-0 updates/i386 these shouldn't have to be t