On 06/14/2014 05:00 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:50:52 -0400
Jason Pyeron wrote:
That's it. 15 users, with 20 2GB+ mbox files with a daily change of a 100k+
was killing our backup effort by having to backup .6TB every day.
*shudder*
Email isn't a database.
Convince google of
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Mike Burger
wrote:
> On 2014-06-13 1:00 pm, Frank Cox wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:50:52 -0400
> > Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >
> >> That's it. 15 users, with 20 2GB+ mbox files with a daily change of a
> >> 100k+
> >> was killing our backup effort by having to ba
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Mike Burger
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 13:51
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] procmail and dovecot
>
> On 2014-06-13 1:00 pm, Frank Cox w
Mike Burger wrote:
> On 2014-06-13 1:00 pm, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:50:52 -0400
>> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>>
>>> That's it. 15 users, with 20 2GB+ mbox files with a daily change of a
>>> 100k+ was killing our backup effort by having to backup .6TB every day.
>>
>> *shudder*
>>
>> Em
On 2014-06-13 1:00 pm, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:50:52 -0400
> Jason Pyeron wrote:
>
>> That's it. 15 users, with 20 2GB+ mbox files with a daily change of a
>> 100k+
>> was killing our backup effort by having to backup .6TB every day.
>
> *shudder*
>
> Email isn't a database.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:31:36AM -0700, Paul Heinlein wrote:
>
>
> (I'm a dinosaur, still using a CLI mail client, so I still prefer
> folder-based organization -- but I recognize I'm part of a small and
> shrinking minority.)
Long live the commandline!
Remember, "In The Beginning Was Th
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014 12:50:52 -0400
Jason Pyeron wrote:
> That's it. 15 users, with 20 2GB+ mbox files with a daily change of a 100k+
> was killing our backup effort by having to backup .6TB every day.
*shudder*
Email isn't a database.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melv
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Heinlein
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 12:32
>
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Chuck Campbell wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:14:06AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> >>> Does anyone know how to get procmail and dovecot to play happily
> >>> together with mbo
On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Chuck Campbell wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:14:06AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
Does anyone know how to get procmail and dovecot to play happily
together with mboxes? I'm on Centos 6.5, fully patched.
I'm getting tons of lock timeouts which is killing performance.
T
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 09:14:06AM -0400, Jason Pyeron wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chuck Campbell
> > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 9:09
> >
> > Does anyone know how to get procmail and dovecot to play
> > happily together with
> > mboxes? I'm on Centos 6.5, fully patched.
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Chuck Campbell
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2014 9:09
>
> Does anyone know how to get procmail and dovecot to play
> happily together with
> mboxes? I'm on Centos 6.5, fully patched.
>
> I'm getting tons of lock timeouts which is killing performance.
That is 1
Does anyone know how to get procmail and dovecot to play happily together with
mboxes? I'm on Centos 6.5, fully patched.
I'm getting tons of lock timeouts which is killing performance.
I tried using dovecot's lda from procmail, which prompted many adjustments to
selinux, which I managed, but it
12 matches
Mail list logo
