[CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

When using ifcfg-eth0:x files in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/, should each file (where x increments appropriately) point to DEVICE=eth0:x or DEVICE=eth0:0? I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does

Re: [CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does seem odd, the alias IPs are being appropriately responded to, answering pings and nameserver requests. /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0:0 =

Re: [CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

On 9/14/07, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/RangeOfIpsOnEthx Suggestions are welcome and much appreciated. -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell

Re: [CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

Jim Perrin wrote: On 9/14/07, Ray Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/RangeOfIpsOnEthx Hi Jim, Thank you for the link...it's definitely good to know one can assign a range of IPs with ease using that type of directive. As my additional IPs were not

Re: [CentOS] question on alias IPs using ifcfg-eth0:x

Barry Brimer wrote: I apparently have my alias files all ifcfg-eth0:0 - ifcfg-eth0:7 show DEVICE=eth0:0. Is this right? It seems odd to me and while it does seem odd, the alias IPs are being appropriately responded to, answering pings and nameserver requests.