Scott Silva wrote:
> Could it be that the bad sectors so far have been in unused areas? Once a
> drive runs out of sectors to map corrections to, I would really think
> about replacing it.
This advice is so often repeated by people on lists. This is a pretty normal
function of modern hard drives
On 04/01/2011 05:32 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The machine is r
On 4/1/2011 11:32 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
my .02 i would replace the drive.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Jerry Geis wrote:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
>X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The machine is runnin
Jerry Geis wrote:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The machine is running fine.. raid array
on 4/1/2011 8:32 AM Jerry Geis spake the following:
> dmesg is not reporting any issues.
>
> The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
> md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
> X blocks [2/2] [UU]
>
> however /var/log/messages says:
>
> smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
>
> The
dmesg is not reporting any issues.
The /proc/mdstat looks fine.
md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0]
X blocks [2/2] [UU]
however /var/log/messages says:
smartd[3392] Device /dev/sda 20 offline uncorrectable sectors
The machine is running fine.. raid array looks good - what
is up with smartd?
7 matches
Mail list logo