-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/28/2013 10:06 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>>
>> Op 25-04-13 19:41, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
>>> John R Pierce wrote:
On 4/25/2013 5:01 AM, mark wrote:
> Two things: unless this is a laptop, shut down NetworkMan
Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>
> Op 25-04-13 19:41, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
>> John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 4/25/2013 5:01 AM, mark wrote:
Two things: unless this is a laptop, shut down NetworkManager - there
is *no* use for it in a wired environment.
>>> doesn't it handle DHCP too? or is t
Op 25-04-13 19:41, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
> John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 4/25/2013 5:01 AM, mark wrote:
>>> Two things: unless this is a laptop, shut down NetworkManager - there is
>>> *no* use for it in a wired environment.
>> doesn't it handle DHCP too? or is there an alternate mechanism for
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 4/25/2013 5:01 AM, mark wrote:
>> Two things: unless this is a laptop, shut down NetworkManager - there is
>> *no* use for it in a wired environment.
>
> doesn't it handle DHCP too? or is there an alternate mechanism for that?
Dunno if it does, but network certainly do
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:27 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> Two things: unless this is a laptop, shut down NetworkManager - there is
>> *no* use for it in a wired environment.
>
> doesn't it handle DHCP too? or is there an alternate mechanism for that?
At least in an 'always connected' scenari
On 4/25/2013 8:36 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>> Ah! And selinux. Have you encrypted the h/d's?
> you know, I did argue that with my boss but he was against it. Guess he
> didn't want to type 2 passwords.
> So the only encrypted laptop is my own.
> But my boss was sorry when his got stolen a few mon
On 4/25/2013 5:01 AM, mark wrote:
> Two things: unless this is a laptop, shut down NetworkManager - there is
> *no* use for it in a wired environment.
doesn't it handle DHCP too? or is there an alternate mechanism for that?
--
john r pierce 37N 122W
some
Op 25-04-13 16:33, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
> Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>> Op 25-04-13 14:49, Daniel J Walsh schreef:
>>> On 04/25/2013 04:54 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
> John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Da
Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Op 25-04-13 14:49, Daniel J Walsh schreef:
>> On 04/25/2013 04:54 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>>> Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>> Disabling SELinux is not g
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 7:49 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> See if chcon -t bin_t /usr/bin/rsync solves your problem.
>
> I believe that NetworkManager runs its helper scripts as initrc_t which is an
> unconfined domains, except that when it executes rsync, it transition to a
> confined rsync serve
Op 25-04-13 14:49, Daniel J Walsh schreef:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/25/2013 04:54 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
>>> John R. Dennison wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/25/2013 04:54 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
>> John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Disabling SELinux is not going to fix your pro
On 04/25/13 04:54, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
>> John R. Dennison wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
Disabling SELinux is not going to fix your problem. Since the field is
just showing you that you have ex
:-)
In this context " I ' run your backup when
verzonden m.b.v Android
vandaar de beknoptheid.
John R Pierce schreef:
>On 4/25/2013 3:57 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>> I suspect there is no boolean to allow what you want so if you want selinux
>> enabled you'll need to build a module - look at
On 4/25/2013 3:57 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> I suspect there is no boolean to allow what you want so if you want selinux
> enabled you'll need to build a module - look at audit2allow and the various
> guides surrounding that for how to use
and you wonder why people give up on selinux. 'sorry, bos
> as far as I can test this at the moment, it works without Selinux and
> doesn't work with Selinux enabled.
>
> I also want Selinux enabled.
> So I will do some searching on how to make it work with Selinux.
>
>
>
Although i don't use NetworkManager I suspect it runs in some kind of
context such a
Op 24-04-13 22:53, m.r...@5-cent.us schreef:
> John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>> Disabling SELinux is not going to fix your problem. Since the field is
>>> just showing you that you have extended attibutes assigned to yr files.
>>>
>
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>
>> Disabling SELinux is not going to fix your problem. Since the field is
>> just showing you that you have extended attibutes assigned to yr files.
>>
>> Why not just script around it.
>>
>> ls -l | sed '
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 03:06:11PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
> Disabling SELinux is not going to fix your problem. Since the field is just
> showing you that you have extended attibutes assigned to yr files.
>
> Why not just script around it.
>
> ls -l | sed 's/\. / /g'
>
> Would replace a
Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> thanks for the responses.
>
> Indeed, on machine A, Selinux is disabled.
>
> -bash-4.1# selinuxenabled && echo enabled || echo disabled
> disabled
>
> and on machine B, it's enabled.
>
> I will test the script again on B with Selinux disabled.
>
ARGH. Unless y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/24/2013 02:57 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> thanks for the responses.
>
> Indeed, on machine A, Selinux is disabled.
>
> -bash-4.1# selinuxenabled && echo enabled || echo disabled disabled
>
> and on machine B, it's enabled.
>
>
Dear All,
thanks for the responses.
Indeed, on machine A, Selinux is disabled.
-bash-4.1# selinuxenabled && echo enabled || echo disabled
disabled
and on machine B, it's enabled.
I will test the script again on B with Selinux disabled.
Greetings, J.
Op 24-04-13 18:06, Ian Forde schreef:
> Ye
Yep - you'll want to do a 'ls -lZ' on both dirs and compare the
differences...
On Apr 24, 2013 8:32 AM, "Larry Martell" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Johan Vermeulen
> wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts.
> >
> > I see a difference in mach
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Johan Vermeulen
wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts.
>
> I see a difference in machine A :
>
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:33 .
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 jan 9 12:13 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13
On 04/24/2013 07:50 AM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts.
>
> I see a difference in machine A :
>
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:33 .
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 jan 9 12:13 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13 00-netrep
On 04/24/2013 04:50 PM, Johan Vermeulen wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts.
>
> I see a difference in machine A :
>
> drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:33 .
> drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 jan 9 12:13 ..
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13 00-net
Dear All,
I'm currently troubleshooting NetworkManger scripts.
I see a difference in machine A :
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 apr 24 16:33 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 jan 9 12:13 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 175 jan 9 12:13 00-netreport
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 335 okt 22 2012 04-iscsi
-rwxr-xr
27 matches
Mail list logo
