Re: [CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1

On Dec 4, 2007, at 11:38 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote: On Dec 4, 2007 2:34 AM, Francesco Camisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW. Your message had References: and In-Reply-To: headers indicating that you started the "new" thread by doing a "Reply"

Re: [CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1

On Dec 4, 2007 2:34 AM, Francesco Camisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW. Your message had References: and In-Reply-To: headers indicating that you started the "new" thread by doing a "Reply" operation on an existing message in another thread.

Re: [CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1

Hi, On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 11:34:33AM +0100, Francesco Camisa wrote: > YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW. definitely not: 46965 Dec 04 Heitor A. M. Ca ( 23) [CentOS] Outdated packages on 5.1 46966 Dec 04 Francesco Camis ( 43) ##>[CentOS] redhat-release s

Re: [CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1

YOU MIGHT WANT TO DOUBLE-CHECK, THE THREAD WAS BRAND NEW. Next time maybe you should point that out nicely. Francesco Francesco Camisa Direttore Amministrativo Policlinico San Marco via Zanotto 40 30173 Mestre-VE Ralph Angenendt wrote: Francesco Camisa wrote: The redhat-release file in C

Re: [CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1

Francesco Camisa wrote: > The redhat-release file in CentOS 5.1 is the same as in 5.0 I was wandering > if this was deliberate. DO NOT HIJACK THREADS. Ralph pgpywq7WzC1Oh.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ C

[CentOS] redhat-release still 5 Final in CentOS 5.1

The redhat-release file in CentOS 5.1 is the same as in 5.0 I was wandering if this was deliberate. Francesco Francesco Camisa Direttore Amministrativo Policlinico San Marco via Zanotto 40 30173 Mestre-VE Heitor A. M. Cardozo wrote: Hi, A package verification on recently CentOS 5.1 reveal