On Thursday, June 09, 2016 05:18:03 PM Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Thank you for your reply and sorry for late.
>
> My needs is only get a copy of large dataset a make sure that it is not
> broken after transfer. After transfer, this data will be stored on local
> backup server where there is bacula
Le 04/06/2016 à 12:34, Alessandro Baggi a écrit :
> Hi list,
> i've need to backup a partition of ~200GB with a local connection of 8/2
> mbps.
>
> Tool like bacula, amanda can't help me due to low bandwidth in local
> server.
>
> I'm thinking rsync will be a good choice.
>
> What do you think a
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 17:17 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Besides, if it's that big a business, management *really* needs to spring
> for a hot spare complete system, to deal with hardware outages, and there
> should be mirrored d/bs, and *those* could be taken down, copied, and then
> brought
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 6/9/2016 1:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> That's what "middle of the night maintenance window" is for.
>
> in today's 24/7 global business world, there is no middle of the night,
> its midday *somewhere*.
>
You pick the least buy day/time. For example, when I was suppor
On Thu, June 9, 2016 3:03 pm, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 11:43 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> When databases are concerned, I would never rely on a snapshot of their
>> storage files. Either stop relevant daemon(s), then do fs snapshot, or
>> better though do dbdump and restore databases
On 6/9/2016 1:16 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
That's what "middle of the night maintenance window" is for.
in today's 24/7 global business world, there is no middle of the night,
its midday *somewhere*.
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 11:43 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> When databases are concerned, I would never rely on a snapshot of their
>> storage files. Either stop relevant daemon(s), then do fs snapshot, or
>> better though do dbdump and restore databases from dump when you need to
>> r
On 06/09/2016 11:43 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
When databases are concerned, I would never rely on a snapshot of their
storage files. Either stop relevant daemon(s), then do fs snapshot, or
better though do dbdump and restore databases from dump when you need to
restore it.
Dumping and restoring
On 06/09/2016 11:14 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
Rsync processes one file at a time, so if the files are being updated
while its running, the differnet files will be copied at different
times. This is usually fine for static archives of files and such,
but unsuitable for a database server where r
On 06/09/2016 10:56 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2016-06-09, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 06/09/2016 08:18 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
How I can perform this check?
Run rsync with the -c argument.
Will this be very slow if Alessandro has a large number of files? OTOH
if he really needs to ensure
On Jun 9, 2016, at 1:11 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>
> filesystem level snapshots such as provided by ZFS are also very workable for
> such databases, as they are point-in-time views of the filesystem. even if
> transactions are in process when the snapshot is made, if its later restored
> and
On 6/9/2016 11:43 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
When databases are concerned, I would never rely on a snapshot of their
storage files. Either stop relevant daemon(s), then do fs snapshot, or
better though do dbdump and restore databases from dump when you need to
restore it. Also: databases usually h
On Thu, June 9, 2016 1:14 pm, John R Pierce wrote:
> where Rsync falls down, is if you need a point in time snapshot... Rsync
> processes one file at a time, so if the files are being updated while
> its running, the differnet files will be copied at different times.
> This is usually fine for sta
where Rsync falls down, is if you need a point in time snapshot... Rsync
processes one file at a time, so if the files are being updated while
its running, the differnet files will be copied at different times.
This is usually fine for static archives of files and such, but
unsuitable for a d
On 2016-06-09, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 06/09/2016 08:18 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>> How I can perform this check?
>
>
> Run rsync with the -c argument.
Will this be very slow if Alessandro has a large number of files? OTOH
if he really needs to ensure integrity there likely isn't a better
On 06/09/2016 08:18 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
How I can perform this check?
Run rsync with the -c argument.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Il 07/06/2016 21:35, Keith Keller ha scritto:
On 2016-06-04, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
i've need to backup a partition of ~200GB with a local connection of 8/2
mbps.
Tool like bacula, amanda can't help me due to low bandwidth in local server.
I'm thinking rsync will be a good choice.
If you w
On 2016-06-04, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> i've need to backup a partition of ~200GB with a local connection of 8/2
> mbps.
>
> Tool like bacula, amanda can't help me due to low bandwidth in local server.
>
> I'm thinking rsync will be a good choice.
If you want pseudo-snapshots (not real point-in
t, 4 Jun 2016 12:34:40 +0200
> Subject: [CentOS] remote backup
>
> Hi list,
> i've need to backup a partition of ~200GB with a local connection of 8/2
> mbps.
>
> Tool like bacula, amanda can't help me due to low bandwidth in local server.
>
> I'm think
Hi list,
i've need to backup a partition of ~200GB with a local connection of 8/2
mbps.
Tool like bacula, amanda can't help me due to low bandwidth in local server.
I'm thinking rsync will be a good choice.
What do you think about?
Thanks in advance.
_
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:19 +0200, Michael Kress wrote:
> Hi, you're searching for a solution that makes snapshots with hardlinks
> 1) use rsync --delete over ssh
> 2) use cp -al to create generations
> 3) rotate the generations daily, just with mv
> The generations use nearly no additional disk s
David Suhendrik wrote:
>
>>> Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet, but you might want to have a
>>> look at a product called BackupPC, which is based on rsync but puts a
>>> really nice front end on it.
>>>
>>> Not sure if it can work over SSH though. Just read the fine manual to find
>>> out.
Les Mikesell wrote:
Alan McKay wrote:
Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet, but you might want to have a
look at a product called BackupPC, which is based on rsync but puts a
really nice front end on it.
Not sure if it can work over SSH though. Just read the fine manual to find
Alan McKay wrote:
> Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet, but you might want to have a
> look at a product called BackupPC, which is based on rsync but puts a
> really nice front end on it.
>
> Not sure if it can work over SSH though. Just read the fine manual to find
> out.
Yes, backuppc can
Martin,
you may want to take a look on http://www.nongnu.org/storebackup/ I am
using that program for some month now. It installs easily, runs over
SSH connection, and saves a lot of space on the target machine by
hard-linking identical files between various backups.
on Friday, September 4, 2009
Not sure if anyone mentioned this yet, but you might want to have a
look at a product called BackupPC, which is based on rsync but puts a
really nice front end on it.
Not sure if it can work over SSH though. Just read the fine manual to find out.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertis
Hi, you're searching for a solution that makes snapshots with hardlinks
1) use rsync --delete over ssh
2) use cp -al to create generations
3) rotate the generations daily, just with mv
The generations use nearly no additional disk space, only changes in the
file system consume space (i.e. addition
happymaster23 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
>
> Or - if there is in CentOS repo (or EPEL) package, that can mo
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 09/04/2009 11:45 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> Backuppc is ideal for this - it not only uses rsync over ssh for the
>> xfer (along with some other choices) but it keeps the files compressed
>> and uses hardlinks to de-
On 09/04/2009 11:45 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
>>> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
>>> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
>>> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
>>>
>>> Or - if there is
happymaster23 wrote:
> Thank you for reply,
>
> I will look into, but overally - I am looking for rockstable solution,
> because security is on the first place.
If you have any questions, please post on the backuppc mail list -
you'll probably find someone with experience with similar usage. T
Thank you for reply,
I will look into, but overally - I am looking for rockstable solution,
because security is on the first place.
2009/9/4 Vinicius Coque :
> You could use Bacula (www.bacula.org)
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM, happymaster23
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want mount directo
Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
>> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
>> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
>>
>> Or - if there is in CentOS repo (or EPEL) package, that can mount
>>
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, nate wrote:
> happymaster23 wrote:
>> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
>> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
>> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
> rsnapshot should be available.
>
> You
Thank you,
I will look into.
2009/9/4 nate :
> happymaster23 wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
>> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
>> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
>>
>> Or - if
Thank you for reply,
because rsync is only synchronizing data (with all errors), this is
not backup. If on main server will be some data corruption and backup
server will connect and synchronize all data with errors, I have
nothing :).
For example - rdiff-backup is working with increments, so you
You could use Bacula (www.bacula.org)
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:23 PM, happymaster23 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFT
happymaster23 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
>
> Or - if there is in CentOS repo (or EPEL) package, that can moun
On 09/04/2009 11:23 AM, happymaster23 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
> looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
> encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
>
> Or - if there is in CentOS repo (or EP
Hello,
I want mount directory of one server to another over internet. I was
looking to NFS4, but there are no security mechanisms. I need
encrypted connection using private key (something like SFTP).
Or - if there is in CentOS repo (or EPEL) package, that can mount
directory over internet using p
40 matches
Mail list logo
